Knowledge and Power

Lunde, Åshild; Heggen, Kristin; Strand, Roger

doi:10.1177/1558689812471087

Cited by 31 publications

(25 citation statements)

References 11 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Power imbalances have been found to exist around stakeholder or patient and public engagement in healthcare service development between professionals and members of public, where the views and knowledge of professionals are seen as having greater value or legitimacy (e.g., O'Shea et al, 2019). Lunde et al (2012) point out 'it is in the relationship between the individual and the institution that power operates most clearly' (pg. 207).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Expect the unexpected? Challenges of prospectively exploring stakeholder engagement in research

O’Shea

Boaz

Hanney

et al. 2021

Humanit Soc Sci Commun

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Stakeholder engagement in research is increasingly viewed as making a major contribution to assisting impact. This paper draws on a longitudinal, prospective impact study exploring stakeholder engagement in a 3-year tobacco control research project which used stakeholder engagement in the development, testing and dissemination of its return on investment tool. The paper presents the challenges of data collection when undertaking prospective research on stakeholder engagement in health-related research. The impact study used mixed methods of data collection to explore stakeholder engagement in the target project, comprising surveys, interviews and observations of meetings and events involving stakeholders. Stakeholder engagement that actually occurred in the target project, and the data collection methods of stakeholder engagement that were actually used in the impact study, varied substantially from those intended in each case. Data collection for the impact study was dependent on the target project’s stakeholder engagement, which became substantially reduced. Modifications to data collection for the impact study were required. One of the reasons for the reduction of stakeholder engagement was linked to constraints on the target project to meet non-negotiable deadlines. Another factor was concerns about overburdening stakeholders. The knock-on effect of reduced stakeholder engagement highlighted the impact study’s lack of control over its data collection, which was related to the prospective nature of the study. The authors acknowledge that an advantage of a retrospective approach over a prospective one is researchers knowing about data availability and accessibility from the outset. However, the prospective approach of the impact study enabled insight into stakeholder engagement in real-time: how and when it occurred, the challenges, and the experiences of stakeholders and the target project researchers. While the quantity of data gathered was considerably less than anticipated, the quality of data was rich and enabled the impact study objectives to be achieved. With increasing emphasis on public engagement in research and calls for engagement to be evaluated for impact, this paper aims—by highlighting the challenges the impact study experienced—to provide some insight to future research that seeks to respond to those calls.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…207). Conspicuous power relations are also believed to exist in interdisciplinary collaborative research (Lunde et al, 2012). SEE-Impact possessed little control over its data collection by the very nature of the study -the fact it was prospectively exploring SE in another research project.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Expect the unexpected? Challenges of prospectively exploring stakeholder engagement in research

O’Shea

Boaz

Hanney

et al. 2021

Humanit Soc Sci Commun

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In a highly influential article, Morgan (2007) identified epistemological stances as one of four versions of paradigms impacting the combining of methods. This stance represents the dominant version of paradigms present in the social sciences; its influence is evidenced by barriers to integration reported in recent analyzes of collaboration in MMR (e.g., Lunde et al, 2013). Yet regarding paradigms as beliefs shared among a group of practitioners rather than a factor binding investigators to disciplinary origins may assist in moving IT into a reflexive realm where communicative exchange central to meaning making and to pragmatic approaches to research are possible (Denscombe, 2008; Morgan, 2007).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Recent inquiries into collaboration, namely, the nuances of team dynamics (Hemmings et al, 2013), communities of research practice (Denscombe, 2008), and the social interplay between collaborating investigators (Lunde, Heggen, & Strand, 2013), provide examples of existing complexities. Individual investigator’s idiosyncrasies and personalities, whether researchers recognize their biases, and the level of methodological respect and investigative openness all exert considerable influence on the success of such collaborative ventures (Bryman, 2007; Lunde et al, 2013; Youngs & Piggot-Irvine, 2012). Understanding how collaboration has occurred in MMR and identifying collaborative methods that could attend to these important nuances are essential to developing usable strategies to assist in MM inquiry.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Investigator Triangulation

Archibald

2015

Journal of Mixed Methods Research

221

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of this article is to explore investigator triangulation (IT), a collaborative strategy with potential for mixed methods research (MMR). A critical review of the literature was conducted to identify IT's core elements and its use in MMR. Five databases, 2 MMR journals, and 13 MMR texts were searched for evidence of IT according to preestablished inclusion criteria. IT descriptions and applications were inconsistent and lacked detailed reporting. Incongruence between IT procedures and associated claims were present. IT was generally limited to singlestrand data analysis and was used predominantly to reduce researcher bias. IT's potential as a generative and pragmatic research strategy used to engage with tensions emerging through diversity in MMR is explored and reporting guidelines are presented.

show abstract

“…The use of a mixed-methods design will allow the researches to gain a deeper understanding of the healthcare students experiences of breaching academic integrity. This deeper understanding would not, according to Lunde et al (2013), come from using a single method.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Experiences of Healthcare Students Who Have Been Accused of Breaching Academic Integrity: A Study Protocol

Summers

Wadsworth

Bratby

et al. 2021

International Journal of Qualitative Methods

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Design: A mixed-methods design will be used to collect data for the study, with each stage being of equal importance. Stage one is an online survey and stage two is a series of semi-structured interviews. Context of study: To explore the experiences of healthcare students who have faced allegations of breaching academic integrity, to improve the support provided to these students. Objectives: The main objectives of this study are to explore and describe the experiences of these students to develop an understanding of the areas they need support while going through this process. Study population: Healthcare students studying at a regional university in Australia.

show abstract

Knowledge and Power

Cited by 31 publications

References 11 publications

Expect the unexpected? Challenges of prospectively exploring stakeholder engagement in research

Expect the unexpected? Challenges of prospectively exploring stakeholder engagement in research

Investigator Triangulation

The Experiences of Healthcare Students Who Have Been Accused of Breaching Academic Integrity: A Study Protocol

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About