Knowledge and perceptions of the intrauterine device among family planning providers in Nepal: a cross-sectional analysis by cadre and sector

Abstract

BackgroundNepal has high unmet need for family planning and low use of intrauterine devices (IUDs). While clients’ attitudes toward the IUD are known in a variety of contexts, little is known about providers’ knowledge and perceptions of the IUD in developing countries. Nepal’s liberal IUD service provision policies allow the opportunity to explore provider knowledge and perceptions across cadres and sectors. This research contributes to an understanding of providers’ IUD perceptions in low-resource environments, and increases evidence for IUD task-sharing and private sector involvement.MethodsA questionnaire was administered to 345 nurses and auxiliary nurse midwives (ANMs) affiliated with the private Mahila Swastha Sewa (MSS) franchise, public sector, or private non-franchise sector. All providers had been trained in TCu 380A IUD insertion and removal. The questionnaire captured providers’ IUD experience, knowledge, and perceived barriers to recommendation. Descriptive, multivariate linear, and multinomial logistic regression was conducted, comparing providers between cadre and sector.ResultsOn average, providers answered 21.5 of 35 questions correctly, for a score of 61.4%. Providers scored the lowest on IUD medical eligibility, answering 5.9 of 14 questions correctly. Over 50% of providers were able to name the four side effects most frequently associated with the IUD; however, one-third of all providers found at least one of these side effects unacceptable. Adjusted results show that cadre does not significantly impact provider’s IUD knowledge scores or side effect perceptions. Public sector affiliation was associated with higher knowledge scores regarding personal characteristic eligibility and more negative perceptions of two normal IUD side effects. IUD knowledge is significantly associated with provider’s recent training and employment at multiple facilities, and side effect perceptions are significantly associated with client volume, range of family planning methods, and region.ConclusionsProvider knowledge and attitudes towards IUD provision are similar across cadre and sector, supporting WHO task-sharing guidelines and validating Nepal’s family planning policies. However, overall provider knowledge is low. We recommend that providers need to receive further training and support to improve knowledge, manage side effects, and recognize women in periods of high unmet need - such as post-partum or post-abortion women - as suitable candidates for IUDs.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12913-015-0701-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Knowledge, attitudes and practice regarding copper intrauterine contraceptive devices among doctors in Malaysia

“…This finding was similar to the study outcome in Nepal 8. The providers’ knowledge also correlates to the workload of the facility, which is translated into the number of patients seen per week.…”

“…Objectively, our study was an adaptation from a survey among nurses as contraception providers in Nepal 8. Surprisingly, our results showed a lower percentage of all correct answers, suggesting a serious knowledge gap among our doctors.…”

“…The questionnaire was developed and validated based on literature research and personal discussion with a previous researcher 8. The overall reliability score using Cronbach’s alpha was 0.769.…”

Assessing the Knowledge and Practice of Health Worker Female on Different Family Planning Methods in Orissa

“…7 A study conducted by Keerti et al 8 regarding knowledge on emergency contraception among nursing students it was found that 55.71% students gave the correct response to ideal clients for emergency contraception. A study by Chakraborty et al 9 found that between 20% and 35% of providers consider the common side effects of painful menstruation, cramping, and excessive bleeding unacceptable while in this study bleeding and infection are the most common side effects associated with IUD. In a study by Eve Espel et al, overall 69-78% of providers had good factual knowledge about the IUD and felt adequately prepared to insert a device or counsel women about it whereas in this study 92% were aware about side effects and when to insert an IUD.…”

Health Care Provider Perceptions of the Safety of IUDs for Women with HIV

“…We assessed the following covariates because previous surveys of U.S. physicians and nurse practitioners have indicated that they may be associated with perceptions of IUD safety for women with HIV: primary clinical focus of public‐sector providers and specialty of office‐based physicians, clinical setting, years out of training and training in IUD insertion . Other covariates included were occupation (physician, registered nurse or midlevel practitioner, the last category comprising physician assistants, certified nurse‐midwives and nurse practitioners); working at a Title X–funded clinic (for public‐sector providers); use of U.S. MEC in clinical practice (based on use of related materials, such as tools or documents); region of practice (based on U.S. Census Bureau definitions); gender; and the proportions of female patients of reproductive age who receive family planning services, receive Medicaid or other public assistance to cover medical services, belong to racial or ethnic minority groups, are not English‐speaking, and are 19 or younger.…”