Knowledge and innovation in start-up ventures: A systematic literature review and research agenda

Guckenbiehl, Peter; Zubielqui, Graciela Corral de; Lindsay, Noël

doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121026

Cited by 29 publications

(16 citation statements)

References 155 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…This study curated the data from the Scopus database, a well-known and comprehensive database covering various social disciplines including business and finance fields (Guckenbiehl et al, 2021). state that the Scopus database contains a greater number of Islamic finance research than other databases such as Web of Science, while it also indexes more well-validated studies than those solely appearing on Google Scholar, EBSCO, or ProQuest.…”

Section: Data Source and Collectionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Fintech in islamic finance literature: A review

Alshater

Saba²,

Supriani³

et al. 2022

Heliyon

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Data Source and Collectionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Fintech in islamic finance literature: A review

Alshater

Saba²,

Supriani³

et al. 2022

Heliyon

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…In line with Staples and Niazi (2006) and Tranfield et al (2003), the research methodology adopted for data collection was planned and carried out in several stages. In addition, we drew on previous systematic reviews (Ceipek et al , 2019; Guckenbiehl et al , 2021; Zahoor et al , 2020). To facilitate our literature review and subsequent data analysis, we used two protocols.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Towards a successful learning process of companies from developing countries involved in offshore outsourcing: proposal for an integrative analytical framework

N’Dri

2022

CPOIB

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose This paper aims to contribute to international business research by providing an integrative framework of the factors determining the learning process of outsourcing companies in developing countries. Design/methodology/approach A systematic review of the literature was performed with an analysis of 84 articles published in peer-reviewed academic journals, published between 2000 and 2020. Findings The results show that the different factors should be seen as complementary and not mutually exclusive. It is the interaction between macro and micro factors that jointly shape the learning of developing country subcontractors. Moreover, the results of the analysis show that many existing studies have not been based on specific theoretical frameworks. Research limitations/implications This study develops a roadmap of the current state of research on the determinants of learning among developing country subcontractors and offers suggestions to guide future research. The authors conclude with a call for methodological advancement and theory development on the topic. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this study proposes the first comprehensive review of the literature on the factors determining the learning of subcontractors in developing countries. The authors have tried to provide an integrative analytical framework to discuss what has been known and what needs to be known in this regard.

show abstract

“…Silva et al ( 2021): explore alternative perspectives on academic entrepreneurship typologies. Guckenbiehl et al (2021): study the use of knowledge for the innovation of star-ups, while investigating the relationship between knowledge and innovation, categorizing the knowledge into sources, mechanisms, and types; and identifying the antecedents of knowledge, innovation measures, descendants of innovation, moderators, and mediators. Hemmert et al (2021): conduct a systematic review of the studies on the entrepreneurship of new ventures in East Asia that have been published in Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)-listed journals between 2000 and 2020.…”

Section: The Main Objectives Of Business and Economics And Public Adm...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Metadata analysis of systematic literature reviews on academic spin-offs

Domingues

Santana

Ruzene

et al. 2022

Int J Innov Educ Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Besides assuming the role of teaching, research, and extension, the university, has expanded the boundaries of scientific knowledge to promote a business ecosystem. The business-related activities can be driven by the leadership of students with an entrepreneurial capacity, based on the technology transfer produced by the academic research and generated by companies that somehow have been idealized or had the active participation of the faculty members and the technology under their control. This model of companies, named in the literature as academic spin-off, has increased the attention of researchers at two main points: i. understanding the phenomenon itself and ii. contribute to identifying the lack of the process, whether related to the support structure or capacitation of faculty members to develop the entrepreneurial activities, as well as in understanding the commercialization of knowledge as technology transfer. In this context, the present work provided a metadata analysis of systematic literature reviews on the academic spin-off, mapping the knowledge on the subject and searching for reviews that cover the technology transfer models to study the viability of protecting the academic intellectual property as a product. Methodology: the data used in this study were retrieved from the database Web of Science and revised according to the protocol Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). The bibliometric analysis of metadata was conducted in RStudio software with the package Bibliometrix and its web interface Biblioshiny. Results: 40 review articles published in peer-reviewed journals from 2006 to 2021 were selected from the initial collection. Then, as result of the bibliometric analysis, it was obtained the data of production indices (main authors, sources, and most cited articles), the evolution of chronological discussion on the subject, and other complementary. Conclusion: it was found indications of studies that discuss technology transfer models and others that examined empiric models in the academic scenario. However, in the selected collection, was not identified any review papers on academic entrepreneurship that were related to the viability of intellectual property as products to be commercialized. Also, it was identified that the word academic entrepreneurship stands out as the main keyword word to represent the research.

show abstract

Knowledge and innovation in start-up ventures: A systematic literature review and research agenda

Cited by 29 publications

References 155 publications

Fintech in islamic finance literature: A review

Fintech in islamic finance literature: A review

Towards a successful learning process of companies from developing countries involved in offshore outsourcing: proposal for an integrative analytical framework

Metadata analysis of systematic literature reviews on academic spin-offs

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About