2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jiph.2017.05.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Knowledge and attitudes toward vaccination: A survey of Serbian students

Abstract: Since vaccination coverage in Serbia has been decreasing and health professionals have been identified as the most important factor in making decisions about immunization, vaccination knowledge and attitudes of students, especially medical students, are of particular interest. A cross-sectional survey was carried out on three groups of 509 Belgrade University students (medical, law and engineering students). The data were collected using an on-line questionnaire posted to student groups and included the Vaccin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

13
52
1
6

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
13
52
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…A significantly higher percentage of nurses compared to students were able to correctly answer questions on adverse effects, indicating that practicing medicine exposes one to correct information on this topic. As identified in other studies (7,8) we also recognized misinformation about safety concerns and lack of correct information as leading causes of vaccine hesitancy. Ironically, many individuals, including medical providers, have never witnessed the devastating disease prevented by current vaccines, and are therefore more likely to question their necessity, effectiveness and rather highlight their possible adverse effects.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…A significantly higher percentage of nurses compared to students were able to correctly answer questions on adverse effects, indicating that practicing medicine exposes one to correct information on this topic. As identified in other studies (7,8) we also recognized misinformation about safety concerns and lack of correct information as leading causes of vaccine hesitancy. Ironically, many individuals, including medical providers, have never witnessed the devastating disease prevented by current vaccines, and are therefore more likely to question their necessity, effectiveness and rather highlight their possible adverse effects.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…Galectin-3 (via integrins), AnnexinA2, Plectin, and Tyrosine 3-monooxygenase/tryptophan 5-monooxygenase activation protein zeta (Ywhaz) are among the exosomal proteins which might promote or stabilize contact between small vesicles and synapses. Importantly, EVs may have an intrinsic capacity to move to reach their synaptic target without the need for any moving fluid or passive transport, as previously suggested ( Cvjetkovic et al, 2017 ), as they contain multiple proteins that regulate actin filament dynamics and reorganization (Cofilin-1, Coronin 1A, Tropomodulin 2, Plectin, Wipf1, Slingshot protein phosphatase 3).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Proteins controlling extracellular matrix organization, such as Fibulin 1 (Fbln1), Cartilage oligomeric matrix protein (Comp), Plasminogen and the Matricellular proteins thrombospondin 1 and 4 may pave the way of ATP-EVs toward synapses, while Vinculin and Fermt3, proteins essential in the organization of focal adhesions, may enhance stabilization of the contact between ATP-EVs and synapses. The capping actin protein Capzb, Cap1 and ARP2 actin related protein might contribute to changes in EV morphology and motility ( Prada et al, 2016 ; Cvjetkovic et al, 2017 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study instrument was a self-administered questionnaire, which was constructed after a thorough literature review and using the findings of earlier qualitative studies and empirical literature. 6,7,23,24 The draft questionnaire was reviewed by three experts for content validity testing. Expert opinions on the importance and intelligibility of the questionnaire content were considered before the final version was distributed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%