2017
DOI: 10.21767/2471-8505.100071
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Knowledge and Attitude about Pain and Pain Management among Critical Care Nurses in a Tertiary Hospital

Abstract: Background: Pain assessment and management are essential parts of nursing care and two of the most fundamental patient rights. It is unethical to let a patient suffer from pain without taking appropriate measures to relief his or her pain.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…*Pain is the most common reason why people visit a healthcare professional (Foster, 2011;Goldberg and McGee, 2011). Effective control of the pain is an important consideration for healthcare professionals to ensure good quality of care and it would be unfair to make the patients feel pain without suitable pain relief or to deliver treatment with high-quality (Issa and Khraisat, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…*Pain is the most common reason why people visit a healthcare professional (Foster, 2011;Goldberg and McGee, 2011). Effective control of the pain is an important consideration for healthcare professionals to ensure good quality of care and it would be unfair to make the patients feel pain without suitable pain relief or to deliver treatment with high-quality (Issa and Khraisat, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All studies used a survey or questionnaire to examine nurse's responses. Half of the studies used the modified versions of Ferrell and McCaffery's (1987) Knowledge and Attitudes Survey Regarding Pain (KASRP), a validated data collection instrument (Adams et al, 2020; Issa et al, 2017; Thapa & Gurung, 2020; Umuhozaa et al, 2019; Wang & Tsai, 2010). The rationale for modifications or specific detail about the modifications to the instrument were not discussed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, five of the included studies (Adams et al, 2020; Brockopp et al, 2003; Manwere et al, 2015; Schreiber et al, 2014; Wang & Tsai, 2010) were of a high quality providing clear description of study design, recruitment, measurement of outcomes and reporting of study results. Four studies (Issa et al, 2017; Karamjeet, 2017; Thapa & Gurung, 2020) provided insufficient detail on various aspects of the study, for example recruitment process and bias minimisation which adversely impacted on our ability to assess their overall quality. These studies did however, report study findings in a clear and precise manner.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recognising global HIV and AIDS trends is the first step in ensuring that patients with HIV and AIDS are appropriately managed. It is challenging to examine and treat HIV and AIDS if they are not recognised (Rasmi Issa, Awaje & Khraisat 2017 :10).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%