1996
DOI: 10.2307/1131768
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Knowledge about Pronouns: A Developmental Study Using a Truth-Value Judgment Task

Abstract: JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These are importantly different and truth-value judgment tasks can help tease them apart. Tasks used in semantic fieldwork draw on those used in language acquisition research (see, e.g., Crain andThornton 1998, Eisele andLust 1996). The use of these types of tasks in semantic fieldwork is discussed in detail in Matthewson 2004. …”
Section: Background On Cheyenne and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These are importantly different and truth-value judgment tasks can help tease them apart. Tasks used in semantic fieldwork draw on those used in language acquisition research (see, e.g., Crain andThornton 1998, Eisele andLust 1996). The use of these types of tasks in semantic fieldwork is discussed in detail in Matthewson 2004. …”
Section: Background On Cheyenne and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conclusion that children base their judgments on linear precedence was challenged by Crain and McKee (1986) (see also Eisele and Lust (1996), Lust and Clifford (1986), Lust et al (1980), McDaniel, Cairns, andHsu (1990)). In particular, using the truth-value judgment, Crain and McKee (1986) proved that children from about 3 years of age reject an anaphoric reading of (28) 88% of the time, whereas they accept this reading in 73% of the cases in (27).…”
Section: Previous Studies On Principle Cmentioning
confidence: 99%