Knowing Pedagogical Dialogues for Learning: Establishing a Repertoire of Classroom Interaction Practices as Core Teaching Practice

Abstract

Pedagogical talk in classroom lessons forms the dynamism of teaching and learning. Understanding how talk functions and influences learning in highly nuanced ways is a fundamental matter for understanding professional practice, and indeed teacher efficacy. However, it is often the case that preservice teacher's (PSTs) explicit knowledge about the role of dialogue for accomplishing lessons hovers above understanding and enacting a repertoire of talk moves that 'actively' promotes student learning and agency. Indeed, both a meta-awareness of dialogic approaches to teaching, and a metalanguage language for talking about talk in lessons, is generally limited to cursory knowings focused on questioning. Arguably, this limitation has the potential to restrict student learning when PSTs begin their teaching careers. The chapter draws on a three-year empirical study conducted in a teacher education faculty in rural Australia. The study centred on supporting PSTs understand dialogicality as core to teaching and to practise enacting quality pedagogical dialogues in classrooms with students. Specifically, this chapter argues that to be productive it is necessary for PSTs to understand, develop and practise a repertoire of interactive talk moves that treat student contributions in discussions as critical for the accomplishment of productive learning experiences.

Investigating key principles for the design of virtual interactions for children that can support the development of oral language through play

“…By harnessing talk as a strategic pedagogical tool, facilitators engaged children and "stimulated and extended their thinking" (Alexander, 2008, p. 37). Edwards-Groves (2014) argues that the creation of a dialogic learning environment is particularly significant when scaffolding diverse educational contexts because it brings "all students into the learning conversation" (p. 11). In the case of RRR classrooms, dialogic learning is powerful in its capacity to develop pragmatic, flexible, and productive use of language, and as such, needs careful consideration in VI design.…”

Questions as Dialogue Games. The Pragmatic Dimensions of “Authentic” Questions

“…The variety of goal-directed activities (Walton 1989b) defining the cooperative inquiry in which students are trained to develop their own original thinking is essentially rooted in dialogical prompts (Lone and Burroughs 2016, 36-38). Questions -and more importantly types of questions (Clegg 1987) -become a fundamental tool for promoting in different ways students' learning and thinking (Sanders 1966;Taba 1966) and an essential tool in dialogic teaching (Edwards-Groves 2014;Edwards-Groves et al 2014).…”