2009
DOI: 10.1007/s11205-009-9478-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Knowing One’s Lot in Life Versus Climbing the Social Ladder: The Formation of Redistributive Preferences in Urban China

Abstract: China, Equal opportunities, Redistribution, Mobility,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(49 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the Chinese case, the lingering effects of communist ideology may have a role to play. Smyth et al (2009a) found that communist ideology affected preferences for redistribution in urban China. Several studies have also found that Marxist beliefs or socialist heritage are important in influencing people's belief formation.…”
Section: Discussion Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the Chinese case, the lingering effects of communist ideology may have a role to play. Smyth et al (2009a) found that communist ideology affected preferences for redistribution in urban China. Several studies have also found that Marxist beliefs or socialist heritage are important in influencing people's belief formation.…”
Section: Discussion Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scholars, including Gijsberts () and Hadler (), have asserted that perceived economic inequality is as important as objective indicators of economic inequality. A sociological approach focuses on an individual's social beliefs regarding what the ideal society looks like and what the society one lives in looks like (Alesina & La Ferrara, ; Kuhn, ; Linos & West, ; Pittau, Massari, & Zelli, ; Smyth, Mishra, & Qian, ). Perceived economic inequality is strongly associated with political ideology or policy attitudes (Bartels, ).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rather than social inequality, therefore, the idea of fairness might be more appropriate for explaining the structure of support for redistribution (Becker, 2019; Dimick et al, 2016; Kulin and Meuleman, 2015; Starmans et al, 2017). If individuals believe that they have fewer or no chance for upward mobility, they are more likely to support redistribution (Alesina et al, 2018; Kulin and Meuleman, 2015; Smyth et al, 2010). This might also suggest that the equality of chance, and not the equality of outcome, is profoundly related to the support for social policies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%