2013
DOI: 10.1111/hic3.12113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Knowing Nature Through History

Abstract: This essay surveys the past 20 years of Canadian environmental historiography in order to understand how scholars in this field have conceptualized and applied nature to the study of the past. The essay argues that Canadian environmental historians, even as they foreground nature as an historical actor, nevertheless continue to focus their attention and orient their investigations around questions of how human social, cultural, economic, and political power reshaped both nature and human experience in the past… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This therefore remains an area where History of Medicine needs to be challenged and pushed into unfamiliar territory (Kirk et al., 2019; Woods et al., 2018). Environmental History works as a useful provocation here as its historiography repeatedly and relentlessly questions the apparent divide between the human (animal) and nature (Piper, 2013)—it is no coincidence that one of the most cited ‘formative’ articles of the discipline, William Cronon's 1996 piece “The Trouble with Wilderness”, precisely demonstrates the artificial and culture‐bound concept of a world without us, of a history that assumes human beings are a distinct and separate category. This critical lens on what are both scientific and cultural boundaries has been used within the History of Medicine but in a less visible and systematic way (Cassidy, 2018).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This therefore remains an area where History of Medicine needs to be challenged and pushed into unfamiliar territory (Kirk et al., 2019; Woods et al., 2018). Environmental History works as a useful provocation here as its historiography repeatedly and relentlessly questions the apparent divide between the human (animal) and nature (Piper, 2013)—it is no coincidence that one of the most cited ‘formative’ articles of the discipline, William Cronon's 1996 piece “The Trouble with Wilderness”, precisely demonstrates the artificial and culture‐bound concept of a world without us, of a history that assumes human beings are a distinct and separate category. This critical lens on what are both scientific and cultural boundaries has been used within the History of Medicine but in a less visible and systematic way (Cassidy, 2018).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another contribution this dissertation makes to the scholarly literature is in the use of micro-physics to address the agency of nature discussions. In the agency of nature debates of Geography, Science and Technology Studies, and Environmental History (FitzSimmons and Goodman 1998;Haraway 1991;Latour 1993;Nash 2005;Piper 2013;Steinberg 2002;Whatmore 2002;Worster 1979) nature has been 'brought back' from being something which is shaped only by human activity to an actor influencing social politics or attached to networks that intersect the human and non-human worlds. When theorists attempt to bridge the natural into the social, one is often given a position of privilege.…”
Section: Normalizing Nature: Larger Implications and Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%