1989
DOI: 10.1090/s0273-0979-1989-15706-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Knots are determined by their complements

Abstract: Two (smooth or PL) knots K, K' in S 3 are equivalent if there exists a homeomorphism h: S 3 -• S 3 such that h(K) = K'. This implies that their complements S 3 -K and S 3 -K' are homeomorphic. Here we announce the converse implication.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
91
0
2

Year Published

1993
1993
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
(2 reference statements)
1
91
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…But if O is the complement of a non-trivial knot, then there is a unique way to Dehn fill (S 3 \ O ) in order to retrieve S 3 . In other words, if S 3 is obtained by Dehn surgery in the complement of a knot, and the knot is non-trivial, then this Dehn filling is unique up to ambient isotopy [15]. From Claim 4·1 we know that R ≈ (1) and P ≈ (0), therefore the Dehn fillings determined by P and R are not equivalent (the gluing diffeomorphisms are not ambient isotopic).…”
Section: Theorem 4·2 (Inversely Repeated Sites) Suppose That the Tanmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But if O is the complement of a non-trivial knot, then there is a unique way to Dehn fill (S 3 \ O ) in order to retrieve S 3 . In other words, if S 3 is obtained by Dehn surgery in the complement of a knot, and the knot is non-trivial, then this Dehn filling is unique up to ambient isotopy [15]. From Claim 4·1 we know that R ≈ (1) and P ≈ (0), therefore the Dehn fillings determined by P and R are not equivalent (the gluing diffeomorphisms are not ambient isotopic).…”
Section: Theorem 4·2 (Inversely Repeated Sites) Suppose That the Tanmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If one cuts M 2 (K) along the core torus T one recovers the knot complement, from which the knot itself can be recovered by Gordon and Luecke [2]. Thus the theorem follows from the following lemma.…”
Section: The 2-generalized Knot Groupmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Also, the peripheral subgroup of the knot group is recovered as the edge group for this edge. Finally, the knot is determined by knot group plus peripheral subgroup by Gordon and Luecke [2]. For n = 3 (and 2) one can use essentially the same argument, but there is an extra V 0 -vertex corresponding to the peripheral Z × Z of the knot group, and the vertex for π 1 (T ) is a V 1 -vertex.…”
Section: The N-generalized Knot Groupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We use the standard techniques of intersection graphs developed by Scharlemann [16] and by Gordon and Luecke [1], [6], [7]. In §2 below, we recall the construction of the intersection graphs in the particular context of this problem.…”
Section: Corollary 2 Under the Hypotheses Of Theorem 1 We Havementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since x; y are consecutive edges of G i at each vertex of C , the edges of G Q \ between x and y at v belong to G 3 i and correspond to intersection points of k 0 with P 3 i . Since P 3 i is separating, it follows that x y is odd, and hence from the parity rule (see for example [6], p. 386) that all vertices of C have the same orientation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%