2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2017.11.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Knee Osteoarthritis After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Bone–Patellar Tendon–Bone Versus Hamstring Tendon Autograft: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

2
19
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
19
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The tendon–bone interface is unable to regenerate a direct-type insertion, and instead forms an indirect-type insertion with inferior biomechanical properties that can potentially lead to osteoarthritis [24, 2022]. Based on our results, increased chondrocytes at the tendon–bone interface during the early phase after ACL reconstruction may be important for the formation of the fibrocartilage layers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…The tendon–bone interface is unable to regenerate a direct-type insertion, and instead forms an indirect-type insertion with inferior biomechanical properties that can potentially lead to osteoarthritis [24, 2022]. Based on our results, increased chondrocytes at the tendon–bone interface during the early phase after ACL reconstruction may be important for the formation of the fibrocartilage layers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Zeng et al 12 also compared autograft with allograft ACLR across 9 RCTs and 10 systematic reviews and found that autografts had greater advantages than irradiated allografts with respect to function and stability, whereas there were no significant differences between autografts and nonirradiated allografts. In their review of 8 RCTs, Belk et al 14 found that BPTB or hamstring autograft had a similar incidence of postoperative knee OA at long-term followup. Similarly, Chee et al in their review of 19 RCTs comparing contemporary 4-strand hamstrings with patellar tendon autografts found comparable results in clinical stability and postoperative functional status across most parameters studied.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10,11 Numerous systematic reviews have been published looking at specific aspects of ACLR. [12][13][14] Notably, in their Level IV evidence systematic review of systematic reviews on ACLR, Anderson et al 15 provided a summary of 240 studies in an attempt to synthesize the literature, whereas Kay et al 16 focused on quality of reporting RCTs in ACLR and found that reporting of a methodologically sound randomization process and prospective calculation of sample size have significantly improved in recent years. The first of these 2 examples included all reviews of different study designs and the second focused on quality of reporting RCTs rather than the contents or results of those trials.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…benefit of ACL reconstruction (ACLR) in preventing PTOA in these patients. 11 In addition, recent systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials have demonstrated no difference in the risk of PTOA after ACLR with bone-patellar tendon-bone versus hamstring tendon autograft, 2 or after single-versus double-bundle ACLR. 3 Patients who sustain ACL rupture are more likely to undergo a total knee arthroplasty (TKA), 5 with 1.4% of patients with an ACL injury undergoing a TKA 15 years after ACLR compared with only 0.2% of case-matched controls.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%