1976
DOI: 10.3109/17453677608988755
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Knee Instability:An Orthoradiographic Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In case of varus alignment, Brouwer et al showed an average of 2°more varus deviation in the standing position than in the supine position [9]. This may especially be relevant in case of lateral ligament laxity [22]. Sabharwal et al found a mean absolute difference of 13.4 mm mechanical axis deviation between supine and weight-bearing radiographs [14].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In case of varus alignment, Brouwer et al showed an average of 2°more varus deviation in the standing position than in the supine position [9]. This may especially be relevant in case of lateral ligament laxity [22]. Sabharwal et al found a mean absolute difference of 13.4 mm mechanical axis deviation between supine and weight-bearing radiographs [14].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In patients with an increase in ligamentous laxity, the difference between the standing and supine WLR may be even greater than that found in our patients. Edholm et al (1976) in an orthoradiographic study with healthy persons, found that knee instability affects the HKA angle. Sanfridsson et al (1996) noted less varus alignment in the two-leg stance than in the one-leg stance WLR, because the one-leg stance forces the knee in varus against the lateral stabilizing structures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The accuracy and reproducibility of measurement of the HKA angle has been shown to be within 2 degrees [11]. In non-OA knees the mean HKA angle is 0.9-1.6 degrees in varus [12-14]. The HKA-angle was measured preoperatively as a part of the indication for surgery and postoperatively during the correction period to determine the progress of the correction and to determine that the desired alignment was obtained.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%