2011
DOI: 10.1007/s00167-011-1604-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Knee functional flexion axis in osteoarthritic patients: comparison in vivo with transepicondylar axis using a navigation system

Abstract: FFA can be used as reference for implant positioning in axial plane also in pathologic knees, while for the frontal plane further investigations are required.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
29
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
29
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Various approaches, including the kinematical analysis, the intra-operative analysis combined with the navigation, and the imaging analysis of the plain radiograph, CT, and magnetic resonance imaging, have been performed [8,14,16,18,21]. However, most of the reports related to the distal femur and the TEA were performed on Caucasian populations, while the present report is mostly restricted to an Asian population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Various approaches, including the kinematical analysis, the intra-operative analysis combined with the navigation, and the imaging analysis of the plain radiograph, CT, and magnetic resonance imaging, have been performed [8,14,16,18,21]. However, most of the reports related to the distal femur and the TEA were performed on Caucasian populations, while the present report is mostly restricted to an Asian population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The radiuses of the medial and lateral circles were 26.0 ± 2.0 mm and 22.8 ± 2.4 mm, respectively. Colle et al [16] performed the intra-operative analyses of the functional flexion axis (FFA) orientation using a navigation system and compared the angle between the TEA and the FFA. In 111 arthritic knees, the average difference between the TEA and FFA was −2.8 ± 5.0°on the frontal plane and 0.6 ± 4.7°on the axial plane, suggesting that the FFA corresponds to the TEA for patients with OA on the axial plane.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rotational alignment of the femoral component would be close to the SEA when it is adjusted to the tibial cut surface with proper MCL tension [2]. Moreover, the SEA is a functional flexion-extension axis and considered an anatomic basis of the coronal plane of the knee reference [8,9,14,20,29], although the reliability of the SEA measurement has not been proven [3,5]. We believe the AP axis of the tibia described by Akagi et al [1] is the appropriate rotational reference of the tibia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Theoretically, there is no rotational mismatch between the femoral and tibial components in extension when surgeons use the AP axis as the rotational reference of the tibia. Additionally, the AP axis is perpendicular to the coronal plane of the knee when the coronal plane is considered as the plane parallel to the SEA [9,20,21,35]. It is not easy to identify the AP axis during a UKA, especially when using the tibia first-cut technique.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation