1994
DOI: 10.1259/0007-1285-67-802-934
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Knee effusions, radiology and acute knee trauma

Abstract: Sixty patients with acute knee trauma were examined radiographically at presentation and subsequently examined under anaesthetic, when arthroscopy was performed. The aim was to assess whether a normal radiograph at presentation excluded significant knee pathology. Nine patients with significant pathology (25%) had normal radiographs at presentation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The following findings were noted: joint effusion, bone marrow edema, cartilage injuries, and abnormalities of the tendons, meniscus, ligaments, bursas, and fat pads. The following criteria were used to assess these findings: tendons, rupture, thickening or changes to the signal in T 1 (SE), fat‐suppressed T 2 ‐weighted (FSE) and PD sequences; ligaments, rupture, thickening, or changes to the signal in T 1 (SE), FSE, and PD sequences; meniscus, increase in signal intensity in T 1 (SE), FSE, and PD sequences, irregularity or discontinuity of the outline of the joint surface, with meniscus damage graded as follows: classification: 0 = normal, 1 = intrasubstance signal abnormality not extending to the joint surface, 2 = linear intrasubstance signal abnormality not extending to the joint surface, 3 = linear intrasubstance signal abnormality that does extend to the joint surface 48 ; joint cartilage, increase in signal intensity in T 1 (SE), FSE, and PD sequences, indefinite or irregular outline or fissures, chondral injuries were classified as follows: 0 = normal, 1 = surface fissures, 2 = damage compromising <50% of the thickness of the cartilage, 3 = damage compromising >50% of the thickness of the cartilage, but not involving subchondral bone, 4 = damage compromising the entire thickness as far as the subchondral bone; bone marrow edema, increased signal intensity in FSE, and PD sequences and reduced signal intensity in T 1 (SE) weighted sequences; presence of bone marrow edema was quantified as 0 = absent, 1 = discrete, 2 = moderate, 3 = intense; joint effusion was considered absent when the quantity of synovial liquid was less than 5 mm in the suprapatellar bursa and present when there was a quantity larger than 5 mm; edema of the supra‐ and infrapatellar fat pads, the quadriceps (anterior suprapatellar), prefemoral (posterior suprapatellar or supratrochlear), and Hoffa (infrapatellar) fat pads, increased signal intensity in FSE and PD sequences; and reduced signal intensity in T 1 (FSE) sequences. Ganglion cysts and liquid in bursas were described in terms of their locations and classified as present or absent.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following findings were noted: joint effusion, bone marrow edema, cartilage injuries, and abnormalities of the tendons, meniscus, ligaments, bursas, and fat pads. The following criteria were used to assess these findings: tendons, rupture, thickening or changes to the signal in T 1 (SE), fat‐suppressed T 2 ‐weighted (FSE) and PD sequences; ligaments, rupture, thickening, or changes to the signal in T 1 (SE), FSE, and PD sequences; meniscus, increase in signal intensity in T 1 (SE), FSE, and PD sequences, irregularity or discontinuity of the outline of the joint surface, with meniscus damage graded as follows: classification: 0 = normal, 1 = intrasubstance signal abnormality not extending to the joint surface, 2 = linear intrasubstance signal abnormality not extending to the joint surface, 3 = linear intrasubstance signal abnormality that does extend to the joint surface 48 ; joint cartilage, increase in signal intensity in T 1 (SE), FSE, and PD sequences, indefinite or irregular outline or fissures, chondral injuries were classified as follows: 0 = normal, 1 = surface fissures, 2 = damage compromising <50% of the thickness of the cartilage, 3 = damage compromising >50% of the thickness of the cartilage, but not involving subchondral bone, 4 = damage compromising the entire thickness as far as the subchondral bone; bone marrow edema, increased signal intensity in FSE, and PD sequences and reduced signal intensity in T 1 (SE) weighted sequences; presence of bone marrow edema was quantified as 0 = absent, 1 = discrete, 2 = moderate, 3 = intense; joint effusion was considered absent when the quantity of synovial liquid was less than 5 mm in the suprapatellar bursa and present when there was a quantity larger than 5 mm; edema of the supra‐ and infrapatellar fat pads, the quadriceps (anterior suprapatellar), prefemoral (posterior suprapatellar or supratrochlear), and Hoffa (infrapatellar) fat pads, increased signal intensity in FSE and PD sequences; and reduced signal intensity in T 1 (FSE) sequences. Ganglion cysts and liquid in bursas were described in terms of their locations and classified as present or absent.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%