2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2006.11.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Knee Chondral Lesions: Incidence and Correlation Between Arthroscopic and Magnetic Resonance Findings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

6
106
1
4

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 128 publications
(122 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
6
106
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…On the con trary its use for detection of chondral lesion is less widely accepted; although it is very accurate for deep chondral defects (accuracy superior to 90% for the grades III and IV of the ICRS classification (3)), it is much less sensitive for ICRS grades I and II lesions (4). This means that morpho logical MRI shows chondral damage joint (9).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the con trary its use for detection of chondral lesion is less widely accepted; although it is very accurate for deep chondral defects (accuracy superior to 90% for the grades III and IV of the ICRS classification (3)), it is much less sensitive for ICRS grades I and II lesions (4). This means that morpho logical MRI shows chondral damage joint (9).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16,26,27 Whether or not MRI underestimates the number and size of cartilage lesions of the knee joint is a point of controversy. 28 There is general agreement that cartilage damage evaluation on standard MRI examination remains problematic. However, recently developed cartilage- specific MRI sequences were able to demonstrate, depending on the severity of the lesion, a sensitivity of 43-87% and a specificity of 89-97%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, several studies report cartilaginous lesions occurring preferentially in the medial compartment and/or in the medial femoral condyle. 1,12,28,31,[37][38][39][40] To recognize age-specific differences, patients were divided into two age subgroups: (A) subjects aged 18-50 years and (B) subjects aged 51-81 years. The majority of grade I lesions occurred in Group A (65%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…La sensibilidad de la RM es directamente proporcional a la magnitud en cuanto a superficie condral comprometida y profundidad de la lesión (2) . Por otro lado los cartílagos de mayor grosor como los de la rodilla son más fáciles de evaluar que lo cartílagos de aquellas articulaciones más pequeñas.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified