2021
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2101.12206
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

KMT-2019-BLG-0371 and the Limits of Bayesian Analysis

Yun Hak Kim,
Sun-Ju Chung,
Jennifer C. Yee
et al.

Abstract: We show that the perturbation at the peak of the light curve of microlensing event KMT-2019-BLG-0371 is explained by a model with a mass ratio between the host star and planet of q ∼ 0.08. Due to the short event duration (t E ∼ 6.5 days), the secondary object in this system could potentially be a massive giant planet. A Bayesian analysis shows that the system most likely consists of a host star with a mass M h = 0.09 +0.14 −0.05 M and a massive giant planet with a mass M p = 7.70 +11.34 −3.90 M Jup . However, … Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

3
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, if we remove the π E term from Equation ( 16), then the Bayesian host mass estimate is shifted lower to M host = 0.52 +0.32 −0.30 M . We also note that this is in good agreement with the general prediction of Kim et al (2021), for the case of θ E = 0.37 mas and µ rel < 10 mas yr −1 (and no other information), i.e., M host = 0.45 +0.30 −0.23 M . See their Figures 6 and 7.…”
Section: Bayesian Analysissupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In particular, if we remove the π E term from Equation ( 16), then the Bayesian host mass estimate is shifted lower to M host = 0.52 +0.32 −0.30 M . We also note that this is in good agreement with the general prediction of Kim et al (2021), for the case of θ E = 0.37 mas and µ rel < 10 mas yr −1 (and no other information), i.e., M host = 0.45 +0.30 −0.23 M . See their Figures 6 and 7.…”
Section: Bayesian Analysissupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The estimated host and planet masses are (M 1 , M 2 ) ∼ (0.65 M ⊙ , 2 M J ) for KMT-2018-BLG-1976L, ∼ (0.69 M ⊙ , 1 M J ) for KMT-2018-BLG-1996L, and ∼ (0.80 M ⊙ , 14 M J ) for OGLE-2019-BLG-0954L. The estimated mass of OGLE-2019-BLG-0954L is in a good agreement with the θ E -M relation presented in Figure 7 of Kim et al (2021). According to the estimated masses, the hosts of planets are commonly K-type main-sequence stars.…”
Section: Physical Lens Parameterssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…If we adopt a snow-line scaling a snow = 2.7AU(M host /M ⊙ ), then the planets projected separation is a ⊥ ∼ 4 a snow . Kim et al (2021) have shown that, unless µ rel > 10 mas yr −1 (or there is additional information such as a microlens parallax measurement), the Bayesian mass estimate depends only on θ E . While this condition does not apply to KMT-2016-BLG-2605, if we nevertheless input θ E = 0.116 mas into their Figures 7, we obtain M = 0.08 +0.06 −0.04 M ⊙ .…”
Section: Physical Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To this sample, we add KMT-BLG-2019-BLG-0371 (Kim et al 2021), which is not listed at NASA Exoplanet Archive because it has not yet been accepted for publication.…”
Section: Ensemble Of Short-timescale Planetsmentioning
confidence: 99%