2000
DOI: 10.1023/a:1005299227675
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This mechanism is similar to the one proposed by Spruit et al (1987) for the emergence of U-loops at the photospheric level, but taking place in the lower chromosphere (see also Low & Hundhausen 1995;Rust & Kumar 1994). Deng et al (2000) have recently interpreted the formation of long dark AFS in Hα in a similar way, though no magnetic field topology analysis has been done in this case. The main problem with this mechanism is that it supposes that the magnetic force is strong enough to overcome the gravity force, which is not obvious below the middle chromosphere (see e.g.…”
Section: Afs With One Bpsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…This mechanism is similar to the one proposed by Spruit et al (1987) for the emergence of U-loops at the photospheric level, but taking place in the lower chromosphere (see also Low & Hundhausen 1995;Rust & Kumar 1994). Deng et al (2000) have recently interpreted the formation of long dark AFS in Hα in a similar way, though no magnetic field topology analysis has been done in this case. The main problem with this mechanism is that it supposes that the magnetic force is strong enough to overcome the gravity force, which is not obvious below the middle chromosphere (see e.g.…”
Section: Afs With One Bpsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…However, such concave-upward formations have been observed only rarely in non-erupting prominences (see, e.g., Okamoto et al, 2007). An alternative lifting mechanism is the relaxation of magnetic fields during emergence of U loops (Deng et al, 2000) or after reconnection associated with flux cancellation (van Ballegooijen and Martens, 1989;Priest et al, 1996;Litvinenko and Martin, 1999;Galsgaard and Longbottom, 1999;Litvinenko and Wheatland, 2005;Welsch et al, 2005). Simulations of the reconnectionlevitation mechanism have verified that rising field lines are indeed produced by reconnection between bipolar systems, but significant work remains to prove that this mechanism is responsible for the observed motions and properties of prominence plasma.…”
Section: Levitation Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The expanding loops are filled with cold and dense plasma, elevated from lower layers in the chromosphere. The dense material is no longer in gravitational equilibrium, and hence, it flows along the loops into both footpoints (Malherbe et al 1998;Deng et al 2000). This corresponds to a classic description of an arch filament system (AFS), first introduced by Bruzek (1967) using H observations and interpreted by the ''leaky-bucket'' model of Schmieder, Raadu, & Wiik (1991).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%