2001
DOI: 10.1023/a:1011419408419
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, active tectonism in rifts is also accompanied by simultaneous erosion and degradation of fault scarps and rift-shoulder areas, with the subsiding graben providing accommodation space for the resulting sedimentary and volcanic deposits. If volcanic activity is intense and the rates of erosion and sedimentation high, or if the rate of extension is very low, the manifestations of extensional processes can be masked by erosion of fault scarps and by draping of the sedimentary and volcanic units over the various fault generations (Kübler et al, 2018;McCalpin, 2005;Vanneste et al, 2001). Examples of the masking of long-term tectonic processes are the Rio Grande Rift, which has a very low extension rate of ∼0.12 mm yr −1 (Ricketts et al, 2014) and Iceland, which has a relatively high extension rate (∼2 cm yr −1 ), but is affected by glacial overprint.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, active tectonism in rifts is also accompanied by simultaneous erosion and degradation of fault scarps and rift-shoulder areas, with the subsiding graben providing accommodation space for the resulting sedimentary and volcanic deposits. If volcanic activity is intense and the rates of erosion and sedimentation high, or if the rate of extension is very low, the manifestations of extensional processes can be masked by erosion of fault scarps and by draping of the sedimentary and volcanic units over the various fault generations (Kübler et al, 2018;McCalpin, 2005;Vanneste et al, 2001). Examples of the masking of long-term tectonic processes are the Rio Grande Rift, which has a very low extension rate of ∼0.12 mm yr −1 (Ricketts et al, 2014) and Iceland, which has a relatively high extension rate (∼2 cm yr −1 ), but is affected by glacial overprint.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, using historical imagery can prove very useful where urban development may hide previously visible fault scarps. Once a potentially active fault is identified, it is also important to consider a multifaceted approach to a paleoseismic investigation (e.g., Camelbeeck & Meghraoui, 1998; McCalpin et al., 2023; Sherrod et al., 2008; Vanneste et al., 2001). Paleoseismic trenching is a pivotal and essential method needed to verify the existence of Quaternary rupture on faults such as the XELF, and without the use of shallow geophysics (ERT) in conjunction with field mapping, we would have not been able to discern the dip and vertical separation of the fault.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These data are essential for fault‐source models in probabilistic seismic hazard analysis (PSHA) and probabilistic fault displacement hazard analysis (PFDHA) (e.g., Brune, 1968; Chartier et al., 2017; Coppersmith & Youngs, 2000; Youngs & Coppersmith, 1985; Youngs et al., 2003), which are used in the seismic risk models that inform building codes and disaster management. Consequently, the integration of multiple modern paleoseismic techniques (e.g., lidar‐derived high‐resolution topography, shallow geophysics, and paleoseismic trenching; Camelbeeck & Meghraoui, 1998; McCalpin et al., 2023; Sherrod et al., 2008; Vanneste et al., 2001) is necessary to characterize active structures in forearcs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scarp was already recognized by Briquet (1907) as the morphological expression at the topographic surface of tectonic activity along the NeF. Somewhat confusingly, this scarp is now known as the Bree fault scarp (Camelbeeck & Meghraoui, 1998;Vanneste et al, 2001;Vanneste et al, 2002) even though it is not related at all to the BrF as defined by Demyttenaere ten years earlier (Demyttenaere, 1989). Furthermore contrary to the vision expressed by Dusar et al (2001), the BoF does not line up with the ZuF (Dusar et al, 2001) and further to the southeast with the ElF (Stainier, 1911).…”
Section: Local Geological Structure (Fig 1a)mentioning
confidence: 95%