Geschichtsunterricht Im 21. Jahrhundert 2018
DOI: 10.14220/9783737008914.43
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Klas-Göran Karlsson

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A third reference dataset is based on MODIS data (Platnick et al, 2015), and a fourth is on combined geostationary and polar data (ISCCP-HGM, Young et al, 2018). The with each other than previous inter-comparison studies have shown (Stubenrauch et al, 2013, andKarlsson andDevasthale, 2018). For more details and better visibility of all results in Fig.…”
Section: Product Examples and Validation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…A third reference dataset is based on MODIS data (Platnick et al, 2015), and a fourth is on combined geostationary and polar data (ISCCP-HGM, Young et al, 2018). The with each other than previous inter-comparison studies have shown (Stubenrauch et al, 2013, andKarlsson andDevasthale, 2018). For more details and better visibility of all results in Fig.…”
Section: Product Examples and Validation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Earlier comparisons of AVHRR cloud masks with Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) based cloud masks estimated that 1 -3 % of the nominally clear local area coverage AVHRR data are cloud contaminated (Heidinger et al, 2002). More recent studies making use of high sensitivity lidar measurements from the Cloud-Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observation (CALIPSO) mission indicate that the fraction of missed clouds is significantly higher and may even exceed 10 % in some geographical regions (Karlsson et al, 2017 andKarlsson andHåkansson, 2018). One factor that explains this difference to earlier studies is that the CALIPSO-CALIOP lidar is able to observe also very thin clouds which are truly non-visible to AVHRR data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Earlier comparisons of AVHRR cloud masks with Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) based cloud masks estimated that 1 -3 % of the nominally clear local area coverage AVHRR data are cloud contaminated (Heidinger et al, 2002). More recent studies making use of high sensitivity lidar measurements from the Cloud-Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observation (CALIPSO) mission indicate that the fraction of missed clouds is significantly higher and may even exceed 10 % in some geographical regions (Karlsson et al, 2017 andKarlsson andHåkansson, 2018). One factor that explains this difference to earlier studies is that the CALIPSO-CALIOP lidar is able to observe also very thin clouds which are truly non-visible to AVHRR data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%