2003
DOI: 10.1023/a:1022890603066
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For all analysis, 24h mean ozone concentration was chosen as the input parameter to avoid uncertainty associated with use of a threshold concentration (e.g. 40 in AOT40, see Simpson et al, 2007), night-time as well as daytime ozone is included, and previous publications of results from these studies have indicated a linear relationship with this parameter and biological effects on grassland (e.g. Hayes et al, 2011, Hewitt et al, 2014.…”
Section: Plant Materials and Ozone Exposurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For all analysis, 24h mean ozone concentration was chosen as the input parameter to avoid uncertainty associated with use of a threshold concentration (e.g. 40 in AOT40, see Simpson et al, 2007), night-time as well as daytime ozone is included, and previous publications of results from these studies have indicated a linear relationship with this parameter and biological effects on grassland (e.g. Hayes et al, 2011, Hewitt et al, 2014.…”
Section: Plant Materials and Ozone Exposurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dry deposition is parameterized similar to the EMEP model (Simpson et al, 2003b;Emberson, 2000) except for the dry deposition of species on water surfaces where the deposition depends on the solubility of the chemical specie and the wind speed (Asman et al, 1994;Hertel et al, 1995). Wet deposition includes in-cloud and below-cloud scavenging and is calculated as the product of scavenging coefficients and the concentration.…”
Section: The Dehm Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We will refer to this parameterization as Wesely scheme. 30 Regarding the new dry deposition scheme, we follow the European Monitoring and Evaluation Programme (EMEP) MSC-W model (Simpson et al, 2003(Simpson et al, , 2012, which is used for air quality modeling implementing the Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution (CLRTAP). We will refer to this as EMEP scheme throughout the rest of the paper.…”
Section: Ozone Dry Deposition Schemementioning
confidence: 99%