2021
DOI: 10.37825/2239-9747.1014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

KL-6 levels in COVID-19

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
(3 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 study was found by manually searching ( Zeng et al, 2020 ).Of these, 1 meeting abstract, 2 not written in the English language, 40 not relevant, 2 reviews were excluded. The full text of 33 remained studies was assessed for eligibility and 12 case reports or case series ( Horii et al, 2020 ; Inoue et al, 2020 ; Ito et al, 2020 ; Nakamura et al, 2020 ; Scarpati, 2020 , Shibata et al, 2020 ; Shimazu et al, 2020 ; Zeng et al, 2020a ; Fukada et al, 2021 ; Sumimoto et al, 2021 ; Suzuki et al, 2021 ; Yamaya et al, 2021 ), 2 studies that did not report the results clearly ( Miyagami et al, 2021 ; Takeshita et al, 2021 ), 3 studies that did not classify patients based on disease severity ( Frix et al, 2020 ; Chen et al, 2021a ; Scotto et al, 2021 ) and 1 preprint study ( Alimova et al, 2020 ) were excluded. Finally, 15 studies identified as relevant and entered the quality assessment ( Awano et al, 2020 , d'Alessandro et al, 2020a , d'Alessandro and Cameli, 2020 , d'Alessandro et al, 2020b ; Frix et al, 2020 ; jp, 2020 , Saito et al, 2020 ; Wang et al, 2020 ; Xue et al, 2020 ; Anai et al, 2021 ; Bergantini et al, 2021 ; Chen et al, 2021 , d’Alessandro et al, 2021 ; Deng et al, 2021 ; He et al, 2021 ; Peng et al, 2021 ; Scotto et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 study was found by manually searching ( Zeng et al, 2020 ).Of these, 1 meeting abstract, 2 not written in the English language, 40 not relevant, 2 reviews were excluded. The full text of 33 remained studies was assessed for eligibility and 12 case reports or case series ( Horii et al, 2020 ; Inoue et al, 2020 ; Ito et al, 2020 ; Nakamura et al, 2020 ; Scarpati, 2020 , Shibata et al, 2020 ; Shimazu et al, 2020 ; Zeng et al, 2020a ; Fukada et al, 2021 ; Sumimoto et al, 2021 ; Suzuki et al, 2021 ; Yamaya et al, 2021 ), 2 studies that did not report the results clearly ( Miyagami et al, 2021 ; Takeshita et al, 2021 ), 3 studies that did not classify patients based on disease severity ( Frix et al, 2020 ; Chen et al, 2021a ; Scotto et al, 2021 ) and 1 preprint study ( Alimova et al, 2020 ) were excluded. Finally, 15 studies identified as relevant and entered the quality assessment ( Awano et al, 2020 , d'Alessandro et al, 2020a , d'Alessandro and Cameli, 2020 , d'Alessandro et al, 2020b ; Frix et al, 2020 ; jp, 2020 , Saito et al, 2020 ; Wang et al, 2020 ; Xue et al, 2020 ; Anai et al, 2021 ; Bergantini et al, 2021 ; Chen et al, 2021 , d’Alessandro et al, 2021 ; Deng et al, 2021 ; He et al, 2021 ; Peng et al, 2021 ; Scotto et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…KL-6 is a novel biomarker for ILD, and it is produced by injured/regenerating type II pneumocytes as well as bronchial epithelial cells and other cells [ 7 , 18 , 19 ]. Recent studies have explored the association between KL-6 levels and COVID-19 disease severity or prognosis; KL-6 levels increased according to COVID-19 disease severity and significantly predicted hospital days and poor prognosis in some studies [ 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 ]. KL-6 has been also suggested as a potential biomarker for post-COVID-19 PF [ 7 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%