2010
DOI: 10.1007/bf03213736
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kinship institutions and sex ratios in India

Abstract: This article explores the relationship between kinship institutions and sex ratios inver since Sen (1990) proclaimed that more than 100 million women are missing around the world, referring to the abysmally low fraction of women in the total population, the case of "missing women" has generated considerable interest. In contrast to Europe and North America, where the male-to-female sex ratio is 0.95 (favoring the presence of females), the ratio in many Asian countries -such as India, China, Taiwan, Hong Kong, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
49
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
3
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among young children, the male-to-female sex ratio has actually become more masculine (Garg and Nath 2008; Guilmoto 2008), with the 2011 India census showing a growing numerical deficit of female children over the prior decade (Census of India 2011; Roy and Chattopadhyay 2012). 1 A substantial body of research has documented levels, trends, and group differences in India’s population sex ratio, and has explored the proximate and distal causes of India’s “missing women” (Agnihotri 2000; Chakraborty and Kim 2010; Sen 1992). However, comparatively little research has explored the consequences of distorted population sex ratios for other aspects of society—in India or elsewhere (Dyson 2012; Hesketh and Xing 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among young children, the male-to-female sex ratio has actually become more masculine (Garg and Nath 2008; Guilmoto 2008), with the 2011 India census showing a growing numerical deficit of female children over the prior decade (Census of India 2011; Roy and Chattopadhyay 2012). 1 A substantial body of research has documented levels, trends, and group differences in India’s population sex ratio, and has explored the proximate and distal causes of India’s “missing women” (Agnihotri 2000; Chakraborty and Kim 2010; Sen 1992). However, comparatively little research has explored the consequences of distorted population sex ratios for other aspects of society—in India or elsewhere (Dyson 2012; Hesketh and Xing 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The differences in health between males and females may not only stem from individual-level sources, but also from how the social institutions of gender are woven into the fabric of communities (Martin 2004). India provides a particularly informative case because of rigorous gendered practices in the country and variations in these practices across local contexts (Chakraborty and Kim 2010;Dyson and Moore 1983).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…women absent from the population due to skewed sex ratios, has a long history. For example, under British rule in the 19th century, census officials documented low ratios of women to men in northern India and British officials suspected the Rajputs, a large northern clan, of female infanticide (Chakraborty & Kim (2008)). Whereas in the past much of the ob-served sex imbalance was explained by such infanticide and/or differential neglect of girls (Das Gupta (1987)), the spread of ultrasound, amniocentesis, and doctor-provided abortion technology in recent decades has driven sex ratios among younger cohorts.…”
Section: Sex Ratios In Contemporary Indiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15 The primary survey module interviews a representative sample of ever-married women and gathers household infor-mation on maternal and child health outcomes, family planning and reproductive health, utilization of health care services, access to health facilities, and health knowledge. Additional modules focus on household, village, and health facility characteristics, but I do not use them in my analysis.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%