1986
DOI: 10.1021/j100402a043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kinetics, thermodynamics, and mechanism of the formation of benzaldehyde-sulfur(IV) adducts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
23
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The value of the entropy of activation is more negative than we might generally expect for addition reactions of monopositive and mononegative ions. Similar values have been obtained for the addition of bisulfite to formaldehyde (AS*= -108.0 J K-I mol-I (33)), benzaldehyde (AS*= -142.35 J K-I mol-I), and other related compounds (32), and for methylglyoxal (AS* = -77.7 J K-' mol-' (36)). Bunting and Meathre1 (6) obtained AS* = -71.0 J K-' mol-I for the reaction between 10-methylacridinium cation and OH-.…”
Section: Mechanism and Kinetic Analysissupporting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The value of the entropy of activation is more negative than we might generally expect for addition reactions of monopositive and mononegative ions. Similar values have been obtained for the addition of bisulfite to formaldehyde (AS*= -108.0 J K-I mol-I (33)), benzaldehyde (AS*= -142.35 J K-I mol-I), and other related compounds (32), and for methylglyoxal (AS* = -77.7 J K-' mol-' (36)). Bunting and Meathre1 (6) obtained AS* = -71.0 J K-' mol-I for the reaction between 10-methylacridinium cation and OH-.…”
Section: Mechanism and Kinetic Analysissupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Bunting and Meathre1 (6) obtained AS* = -71.0 J K-' mol-I for the reaction between 10-methylacridinium cation and OH-. Olson et al (32) have proposed that the transition complex for the addition of bisulfite to benzaldehyde is a cyclic structure formed between the carbonyl and bisulfite groups. In our case it is difficult to establish a possible structure for the transition complex, which would have a high charge separation that would contribute to the low value of AS*.…”
Section: Mechanism and Kinetic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rate coefficients for the right and left direction were set to k E1 = 2.2 × 10 3 s –1 and k –E1 = 1.0 × 10 10 m –1 s –1 as K a2 = 2.2 × 10 –7 m –1 for sulfur(IV) in the thiosulfatolysis and sulfitolysis of pentathionate in the present work. Here, K a2 approaches the value for the sulfite equilibrium proposed by Hoffmann, for which the corrected acidity constant c K a2 = 2.43 × 10 –7 m for an ionic strength of 0.5 m . The ionic strength of our buffer solution was 0.075 m ; thus, for the protonation process of sulfite in our present work, we set K a2 = 2.2 × 10 –7 m –1 , which is also approximately the same value as that used in our recent work …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…This erroneous value for k 4r was taken from Betterton and Hoffmann, 7 which in turn obtained it from Stewart and Donnally, 8 while we use a value that is derived from K 4 and k 4f . Our value for k 4f is from Olson et al 1 The equilibrium constant for reaction 5 is from Betterton et al 6 This paper discusses the values for this equilibrium constant reported previously, and in particular it points out the erroneous value in Stewart and Donnally. 8 The forward and reverse rate constants are assigned to give this equilibrium constant and a diffusion-controlled value for k 5r .…”
mentioning
confidence: 74%
“…The equilibrium constant and forward rate constant for reaction 1 come from Olson et al, although there are several similar prior reports of these values. 1 The value of K 2 is at µ = 0.1 M as recommended in the NIST database. 2 The forward rate constant for reaction 3 is from the pulse radiolysis study of Merényi et al 3 However, the actual value they reported was 2.6 × 10 6 M -1 s -1 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%