2017
DOI: 10.1063/1.4968339
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kinetics study of Jatropha oil esterification with ethanol in the presence of tin (II) chloride catalyst for biodiesel production

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was utilized to find out the value of the rate constant, activation energy ( E a ), and frequency factor ( A ), expressed by the Arhhenius plot (eqs and ). To find out the value of the frequency factor and activation energy, a graph is plotted between ln k versus 1/ T as shown in Figure b,d,f. ,, It was found that the activation energies for the esterification of acetic acid with n -propanol, isopropanol, and n -butanol are 36.27, 33.51, and 34.69 kJ/mol, respectively, which was quite comparable to that reported in the literature. For propionic acid, the activation energies were found to be 36.34, 35.33, and 35.93; for butyric acid, the values of the activation energy were found to be 35.59, 36.12, and 34.79 kJ/mol, respectively, and were comparable to those reported in the previous literature. , In spite of relatively similar results, the mole ratio of the respective acid to alcohol, catalyst loading, and temperature in our experiments were different than those described in the literature. The activation energy, frequency factor, and coefficient of regression for a series of a carboxylic acid with n -propanol, isopropanol, and n -butanol, respectively, are summarized (Table ) . The linear plot of −ln­(1 – X A ) versus time for the esterification of formic, propionic, butyric, and pentanoic acid with n -propanol, isopropanol, and n -butanol are reported in the Supporting Information.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 66%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…It was utilized to find out the value of the rate constant, activation energy ( E a ), and frequency factor ( A ), expressed by the Arhhenius plot (eqs and ). To find out the value of the frequency factor and activation energy, a graph is plotted between ln k versus 1/ T as shown in Figure b,d,f. ,, It was found that the activation energies for the esterification of acetic acid with n -propanol, isopropanol, and n -butanol are 36.27, 33.51, and 34.69 kJ/mol, respectively, which was quite comparable to that reported in the literature. For propionic acid, the activation energies were found to be 36.34, 35.33, and 35.93; for butyric acid, the values of the activation energy were found to be 35.59, 36.12, and 34.79 kJ/mol, respectively, and were comparable to those reported in the previous literature. , In spite of relatively similar results, the mole ratio of the respective acid to alcohol, catalyst loading, and temperature in our experiments were different than those described in the literature. The activation energy, frequency factor, and coefficient of regression for a series of a carboxylic acid with n -propanol, isopropanol, and n -butanol, respectively, are summarized (Table ) . The linear plot of −ln­(1 – X A ) versus time for the esterification of formic, propionic, butyric, and pentanoic acid with n -propanol, isopropanol, and n -butanol are reported in the Supporting Information.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 66%
“…To find out the value of the frequency factor and activation energy, a graph is plotted between ln k versus 1/T as shown in Figure 6b,d,f. 1,3,11 It was found that the activation energies for the esterification of acetic acid with n-propanol, isopropanol, and n-butanol are 36.27, 33.51, and 34.69 kJ/mol, respectively, which was quite comparable to that reported in the literature. 13−17 For propionic acid, the activation energies were found to be 36.34, 35.33, and 35.93; for butyric acid, the values of the activation energy were found to be 35.59, 36.12, and 34.79 kJ/mol, respectively, and were comparable to those reported in the previous literature.…”
Section: Apparent Activation Energysupporting
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The catalyst facilitates an alternate reaction route to result in the desired products by lowering the activation energy barrier. Hence, as a result, higher conversion and higher reaction rates were obtained . To estimate the effect of the catalyst loading, experiments were conducted by changing the amount of catalyst from 3 to 11% by weight of MCLFAs while keeping the other parameters (temperature and mole ratio) constant.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%