2018
DOI: 10.1039/c8cp05149f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kinetics of the defunctionalization of oxidized few-layer graphene nanoflakes

Abstract: Thermal defunctionalization of oxidized jellyfish-like few-layer graphene nanoflakes was studied under non-isothermal conditions by simultaneous thermal analysis. Activation energies for thermal decomposition of different oxygen functional groups were calculated by the Kissinger method and compared with those for oxidized carbon nanotubes. Oxygen content in graphene nanoflakes was found to significantly affect the decomposition activation energies of carboxylic and keto/hydroxy acids because of their acceptor … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The less data points for the GO suspensions stay only in the initial linear stage and change slower than the GO film, indicating a faster structure and opto-electronic property evolution on a solid than that in suspensions (Figure c). This is consistent with the result that the apparent activation energy obtained here is lower than those reported previously (134–167 kJ mol –1 ). ,, According to previous reports on thermal treatment of GO, extrinsic water plays an important role in C–C bond cleavage and functional group transformation, as interpreted by the proposed dynamic structural model. Considering the humidity effects on SPFM imaging in our previous work, there is water adsorbed on the substrate surface or on the hydrophilic oxygen functional groups on GO. The functional groups are distributed on both sides of GO sheets.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The less data points for the GO suspensions stay only in the initial linear stage and change slower than the GO film, indicating a faster structure and opto-electronic property evolution on a solid than that in suspensions (Figure c). This is consistent with the result that the apparent activation energy obtained here is lower than those reported previously (134–167 kJ mol –1 ). ,, According to previous reports on thermal treatment of GO, extrinsic water plays an important role in C–C bond cleavage and functional group transformation, as interpreted by the proposed dynamic structural model. Considering the humidity effects on SPFM imaging in our previous work, there is water adsorbed on the substrate surface or on the hydrophilic oxygen functional groups on GO. The functional groups are distributed on both sides of GO sheets.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…This is consistent with the result that the apparent activation energy obtained here is lower than those reported previously (134−167 kJ mol −1 ). 42,46,49 According to previous reports on thermal treatment of GO, extrinsic water plays an important role in C−C bond cleavage and functional group transformation, as interpreted by the proposed dynamic structural model. 24−26 Considering the humidity effects on SPFM imaging in our previous work, 34 there is water adsorbed on the substrate surface or on the hydrophilic oxygen functional groups on GO.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The oxidation of GNFs was performed in the presence of HNO 3 (Chimmed, 70%, 1.4 g cm −3 density, and 99.999% purity) according to [ 30 ]. The GNFs were refluxed under HNO 3 for 1 h, filtered, washed with H 2 O, and dried at 80 °C for 24 h. The oxidized GNFs are referred to further as GNFs_ox.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, for reduced graphene oxide (RGO) nanosheets, which are the most common 2D graphene derivatives used as reinforcement, it is supposed that they have no way to directly bond together to form an integrated 3D network structure due to the limitation of the intermediate-temperature region for densification (500°C-1000°C). For the one thing, the temperature is far above the level that RGO nanosheets could be assembled by the Van Der Waals force and electrostatic repulsion benefited from the functional groups on their surface 20 . For another, the temperature is much lower than the level that the overlapped nanosheets fuse together through the high-temperature defect healing and carbon atomic rearrangement 21,22 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%