1998
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.273.32.20007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kinetics of the Action of Thymine DNA Glycosylase

Abstract: The time course of removal of thymine by thymine DNA glycosylase has been measured in vitro. Each molecule of thymine DNA glycosylase removes only one molecule of thymine from DNA containing a G⅐T mismatch because it binds tightly to the apurinic DNA site left after removal of thymine. The 5-flanking base pair to G⅐T mismatches influences the rate of removal of thymine: k cat values with C⅐G, T⅐A, G⅐C, and A⅐T as the 5-base pair were 0.91, 0.023, 0.0046, and 0.0013 min ؊1 , respectively. Thymine DNA glycosylas… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

12
172
2

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 140 publications
(187 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(47 reference statements)
12
172
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The nature of this inhibition is unclear, since Co 2+ and/or Zn 2+ were reported to stimulate the activity of DNA repair enzymes such as E. coli Nfo [54] and Fpg [55], and ZnSO 4 has been included in the reaction buffer of human thymine-DNA glycosylase [56]. Addition of MgCl 2 to the assay buffer did not alter the circular dichroism spectrum of purified UNG2 (data not shown).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The nature of this inhibition is unclear, since Co 2+ and/or Zn 2+ were reported to stimulate the activity of DNA repair enzymes such as E. coli Nfo [54] and Fpg [55], and ZnSO 4 has been included in the reaction buffer of human thymine-DNA glycosylase [56]. Addition of MgCl 2 to the assay buffer did not alter the circular dichroism spectrum of purified UNG2 (data not shown).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…These enzymes face the formidable task of removing a normal base, thymine, from G·T mispairs but not from A·T base pairs. Previous studies show that TDG activity is weak for G·T mispairs compared with most in vitro substrates (e.g., G·U), even though G·T mispairs are an important biological substrate for TDG (8,9,(16)(17)(18)(19). This might reflect a mechanism used by TDG to strike a balance between the requirement for efficient repair of mutagenic G·T lesions and the need for avoiding aberrant removal of T from A·T pairs, which can be mutagenic and cytotoxic (13,20,21).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…UNG preferentially recognizes uracil residues in single-stranded DNA and is also active on duplex DNA containing U⅐G mispairs and U⅐A base pairs (17). In contrast, human thymine-DNA glycosylase does not recognize uracil in single-stranded DNA but does excise uracil residues in double-stranded DNA with the following specificity: U⅐G Ͼ U⅐C Ͼ U⅐T Ͼ Ͼ U⅐A (18,19). The human MED1 (also termed MBD4) enzyme acts on U⅐G mispairs in the context of methylated or unmethylated CpG sites, but activity against uracil-containing single-stranded DNA and U⅐A, U⅐C, or U⅐T double-stranded DNA substrates was not detected (20).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%