1965
DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9258(18)97380-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kinetics of Regulatory Enzymes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

5
42
0

Year Published

1966
1966
1994
1994

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 359 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
5
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even under apparently identical conditions there are substantial variations in the curves of velocity against substrate concentration published by Hathaway & Atkinson (1963), Atkinson et al (1965) and Cennamo et al (1967, 1968. However, these variations are confined to numerical values only: the basic pattern of regulation described by Atkinson et al (1965) has never been in dispute and indeed has been confirmed once more in the present studies.…”
Section: Vol 129 36supporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Even under apparently identical conditions there are substantial variations in the curves of velocity against substrate concentration published by Hathaway & Atkinson (1963), Atkinson et al (1965) and Cennamo et al (1967, 1968. However, these variations are confined to numerical values only: the basic pattern of regulation described by Atkinson et al (1965) has never been in dispute and indeed has been confirmed once more in the present studies.…”
Section: Vol 129 36supporting
confidence: 80%
“…and isocitrate. In partially purified preparations this activation occurs without change in the Hill coefficient of 4 for isocitrate, although the co-operativity of NADI binding is decreased by AMP (Atkinson et al, 1965). Atkinson and co-workers have recently purified the enzyme to homogeneity in the presence of citrate, which acts as a stabilizer.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in the presence of GMP a non-linear relationship is obtained and the lines curve upwards. These data, when replotted according to the Hill equation (Atkinson et al, 1965), give a Hill coefficient n= 1.0 in the absence of GMP, whereas in the presence of O.lmm-GMP and 0.2mM-GMP n = 1.15 and 1.34 respectively. The Hill coefficient n is considered to be a function of the number of substrate-binding sites on the enzyme molecule and of the degree of interaction between these sites (Atkinson et al, 1965).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These data, when replotted according to the Hill equation (Atkinson et al, 1965), give a Hill coefficient n= 1.0 in the absence of GMP, whereas in the presence of O.lmm-GMP and 0.2mM-GMP n = 1.15 and 1.34 respectively. The Hill coefficient n is considered to be a function of the number of substrate-binding sites on the enzyme molecule and of the degree of interaction between these sites (Atkinson et al, 1965). Values for the Hill coefficient greater than 1.0 indicate that the enzyme possesses regulatory or allosteric properties.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mechanism of action proposed by Atkinson, Hathaway & Smith (1965) for the yeast NADspecific isocitrate dehydrogenase appears to have considerable relevance to the characteristics of the pea NAD-specific isocitrate dehydrogenase. As discussed previously (Cox & Davies, 1969) the characteristics of binding of citrate and isocitrate to the latter suggest that both ligands are bound to the same sites.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%