2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2013.11.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kinetics of micronucleus induction and cytotoxicity caused by distinct antineoplastics and alkylating agents in vivo

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
10
0
5

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
10
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Authors describe response rates ranging from 8 to 100% when vincristine is used for the treatment of tumours in vitro , corroborating this work …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Authors describe response rates ranging from 8 to 100% when vincristine is used for the treatment of tumours in vitro , corroborating this work …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Results of this study showed no significant increase in SCEs frequency in the VCR-, VBL- and VRL-treated groups. Previous studies indicated the possible genotoxicity of VCR and VBL [ 12 ]. For example, VCR was shown to induce DNA misrepair, telomere end fusions, nuclear buds, and increased frequency of gene mutations, all of which points to the possible genotoxicity of VCR [ 10 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The micronucleus assay allowed the determination of the long‐term consequences of DNA break production. The kinetic analysis of MN induction allowed us to establish whether different processes participated in MN induction based on the hypothesis that different mechanisms of DNA breaks occur at different times [Morales‐Ramírez et al ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the possibility of crosslinks induced by radiation in BrdU‐substituted DNA, in the present study, radiation significantly increased the third peak of MN induction in BrdU‐substituted cells with respect to unsubstituted cells. To discern the timing of micronucleus induction, we proposed using the time of relative maximal induction (Trmi) [Morales‐Ramírez et al ], which represents the difference in the time of maximal induction by some agents with respect to the maximal induction by ionizing radiation because radiation acts directly without requiring pharmacokinetic processes, in contrast to chemical agents. In the present study, the third peak showed a Trmi of 18 h. In a previous study, higher doses of cisplatinum, busulfan, and bis‐chloroethyl nitrosourea showed a later peak of MN induction between 46 and 48 h [Morales‐Ramírez et al ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation