2005
DOI: 10.1002/0471749311
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kinetics of Materials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

18
441
1
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 656 publications
(463 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
18
441
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…As expected from our discussion, slow cooling leads to much slower solidification than diffusion and, consequently, to a stable nonsupercooled solidification. On the other hand, rapid laser shut-off (shut-off time less than 10 ms) causes the solidification rate to exceed the germanium diffusion rate, which would promote constitutional supercooling (34). In both cases, the experimental results are consistent with the predicted behaviors.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As expected from our discussion, slow cooling leads to much slower solidification than diffusion and, consequently, to a stable nonsupercooled solidification. On the other hand, rapid laser shut-off (shut-off time less than 10 ms) causes the solidification rate to exceed the germanium diffusion rate, which would promote constitutional supercooling (34). In both cases, the experimental results are consistent with the predicted behaviors.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 63%
“…In general, constitutional supercooling arises when solute rejection in the liquid creates steep concentration gradients near the solidification front, leading to a situation where the actual temperature ahead of the front is lower than the liquidus temperature near the interface, which drives instability (29,34). This concentration profile occurs if the diffusion of solute in the liquid is slow compared with the solidification velocity, thus resulting in strong gradients at the interface.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where D 0 is the diffusion constant, Q is the activation energy, R is the gas constant, and T is the temperature [24][25][26][27]. Diffusion constant is not dependent on time, hence one diffusion constant was calculated for each temperature.…”
Section: Analytic Model Of Vitamin E Dopingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where C 0 is the saturation concentration of the material, x is depth, D is the diffusion coefficient, and t is time [24][25][26][27]. The complementary error function, erfc(z), is simply [1−erf(z)].…”
Section: Analytic Model Of Vitamin E Dopingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 In contrast, phase-field models provide a more general, thermodynamically consistent treatment of nucleation and growth without resorting to the artificial placement of phase boundaries. 18,19 Considering the excitement surrounding LiFePO 4 as a phase-separating cathode material, phase-field methods have received relatively little attention. Tang et al modeled phase separation and crystallineto-amorphous transformations in spherical isotropic LiFePO 4 particles with a phase-field model, 20 prompting experiments to seek the predicted amorphous surface layers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%