1978
DOI: 10.1021/bi00605a016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kinetics of ligand binding to dihydrofolate reductase: binary complex formation with NADPH and coenzyme analogues

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

6
91
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
6
91
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A comparison of the data for MuDHFR, EcDHFR-i 9 36, and EcDHFR-i 7 136 (Figure 4) suggested that I 3 (I 2 for MuDHFR) was signi®-cantly populated at equilibrium. In fact, the rate constants obtained from the data described here suggested that for EcDHFR-i 9 36 the I 3 and N conformations were equally populated at equilibrium, and for MuDHFR, the I 2 conformation was populated at approximately 10% compared to N. It is known from previous work of the enzymatic properties of wild-type EcDHFR (Dunn et al, 1978;Penner & Frieden, 1987) that there exists two native forms of the enzyme which are signi®cantly populated at equilibrium. Since one form of the protein binds ligands tightly, one may measure the relative distribution of these two species and their rate of interconversion by monitoring the quenching of tryptophan¯uorescence upon the binding of NADPH (Cayley et al, 1981).…”
Section: A Native Form Of Dhfr May Be a Folding Intermediatementioning
confidence: 48%
“…A comparison of the data for MuDHFR, EcDHFR-i 9 36, and EcDHFR-i 7 136 (Figure 4) suggested that I 3 (I 2 for MuDHFR) was signi®-cantly populated at equilibrium. In fact, the rate constants obtained from the data described here suggested that for EcDHFR-i 9 36 the I 3 and N conformations were equally populated at equilibrium, and for MuDHFR, the I 2 conformation was populated at approximately 10% compared to N. It is known from previous work of the enzymatic properties of wild-type EcDHFR (Dunn et al, 1978;Penner & Frieden, 1987) that there exists two native forms of the enzyme which are signi®cantly populated at equilibrium. Since one form of the protein binds ligands tightly, one may measure the relative distribution of these two species and their rate of interconversion by monitoring the quenching of tryptophan¯uorescence upon the binding of NADPH (Cayley et al, 1981).…”
Section: A Native Form Of Dhfr May Be a Folding Intermediatementioning
confidence: 48%
“…ThioNADP(H) has been used as an inactive cofactor for NADPH in experiments using chicken, mouse, Escherichia coli, and Lactobacillus casei, and it has been shown to bind to the cofactor binding site (Dunn et al, 1978;Smith and Burchall, 1983;Thillet et al, 1990;McTigue et al, 1993). However, when we tested the effect of NADPS on DHFR enzyme activity, only slight inhibition of human DHFR was observed even with 180 mM NADS or NADPS (data not shown).…”
Section: The Effect Of Nad/nadp Analogs On Dhfr Activity and Expressionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Steady-state kinetic parameters were obtained under the conditions of Stone and Morrison (12). Stopped-flow fluorescence quenching was carried out using the method of Cayley et al (13) (16), is greater than 300 s-1, in contrast to the 1.4 s-1 observed for wild type, and in parallel with the weak binding of H2F (Table 1 and see Table 3). Secondly, the deuterium isotope effect in V at pH values below the pKa for [Gly54]DHFR is 3.0, in contrast to a deuterium isotope effect in V of 1.1 for wild type.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in Table 2, the binding of NADPH, the rates of conformer interconversion, and their relative concentrations are all in good agreement with wild-type values, consistent with localized structural changes caused by the mutation. tRate of interconversion of E2 -* El (16), kobS for slow phase;…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%