2006
DOI: 10.1134/s1063783406050015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kinetics of isothermal nucleation in a supercooled iron melt

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
26
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Fractal percolated clusters were later observed by Evteev et al and later included in a review by Ojovan [18][19][20]. In molecular dynamic simulations of pure, supercooled iron, Evteev et al reported that the structural organization of the amorphous phase is believed to be a result of the formation and subsequent growth of mutually penetrating icosahedrons that contain atoms at the vertices and at the centers [18,19].…”
Section: Twinkling Fractal Theorymentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Fractal percolated clusters were later observed by Evteev et al and later included in a review by Ojovan [18][19][20]. In molecular dynamic simulations of pure, supercooled iron, Evteev et al reported that the structural organization of the amorphous phase is believed to be a result of the formation and subsequent growth of mutually penetrating icosahedrons that contain atoms at the vertices and at the centers [18,19].…”
Section: Twinkling Fractal Theorymentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Medvedev et al first observed the argument that glass formation is caused by the formation of solid-like percolation clusters made of high-density configurations in molecular dynamics simulations of liquid, supercooled, and quenched states of rubidium that utilized the Voronoi-Delanuay method [17]. Fractal percolated clusters were later observed by Evteev et al and later included in a review by Ojovan [18][19][20]. In molecular dynamic simulations of pure, supercooled iron, Evteev et al reported that the structural organization of the amorphous phase is believed to be a result of the formation and subsequent growth of mutually penetrating icosahedrons that contain atoms at the vertices and at the centers [18,19].…”
Section: Twinkling Fractal Theorymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…4. Light field TEM image of interstitial glass strongly saturated by nanometric sized gaseous bubbles in spherule NZ8 bn4 25.9. volume provide evidence for a different regime of solidification and is consistent with specific features of isothermal homogeneous crystallization of the over cooled melt [8]. Such crystallization may proceed at the expense of latent heat of crystallization during solidification, when radiation is the only way of heat removal in the absence of thermal conductivity [9].…”
Section: Geochemistrymentioning
confidence: 59%
“…4 show that the main structure changes in the non-crystalline phase take place in the temperature interval from 450 to 700 K, and maximum of the specific heat of non-crystalline phase responds to temperature T ffi550 K. As it was found in the result of simulation in Ref. [32], icosahedral clusters with long lifetime in amorphous Fe hinder the formation of crystallization centers. Our data for Al are an evidence of comparatively long life of big clusters at the temperatures below 550 K. The averaged lifetimes of the icosahedral surrounding of separate atoms are roughly the same as the above-mentioned lifetimes of big clusters.…”
Section: Dt/t After Simplifications Of Their Resultsmentioning
confidence: 77%