Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
1977
DOI: 10.1016/0022-5193(77)90184-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kinetics of irreversible enzyme inhibition: Co-operative effects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

1978
1978
1980
1980

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The inhibitor-resistant portion of the flux may represent (i) leakage in the red cell membrane (which would include the reversibly inhibited portion), (ii) a subsidiary sulfate carrier system that is totally resistant to inactivation by the inhibitors used, (iii) attachment of the irreversible inhibitor on the active site of the protein functioning unit, but in such a manner that only part of the activity of the unit is destroyed (Ray & Koshland, 1961), or (iv) negative irreversible inhibitor cooperativity, e.g., the covalent attachment of one or more irreversible inhibitor molecules to the protein transport unit, but at a site other than the active site of the unit, so that the modified protein unit is resistant to inhibitor attachment (Levy, Leber & Ryan, 1963;Kitchen & Andrews, 1974;Magee & Ebner, 1974;Schram & Lawson, 1963;Rakitzis, 1977). Kinetic evidence alone is insufficient to distinguish between all the above possibilities.…”
Section: K(t)=k R (A+ E Bi E-k~mentioning
confidence: 98%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The inhibitor-resistant portion of the flux may represent (i) leakage in the red cell membrane (which would include the reversibly inhibited portion), (ii) a subsidiary sulfate carrier system that is totally resistant to inactivation by the inhibitors used, (iii) attachment of the irreversible inhibitor on the active site of the protein functioning unit, but in such a manner that only part of the activity of the unit is destroyed (Ray & Koshland, 1961), or (iv) negative irreversible inhibitor cooperativity, e.g., the covalent attachment of one or more irreversible inhibitor molecules to the protein transport unit, but at a site other than the active site of the unit, so that the modified protein unit is resistant to inhibitor attachment (Levy, Leber & Ryan, 1963;Kitchen & Andrews, 1974;Magee & Ebner, 1974;Schram & Lawson, 1963;Rakitzis, 1977). Kinetic evidence alone is insufficient to distinguish between all the above possibilities.…”
Section: K(t)=k R (A+ E Bi E-k~mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The solution requires that A+ ~ B~= 1, where m is an empirically i=1 derived parameter giving the number of exponential terms in the rate expression. The theory has been derived in detail in a previous paper (Rakitzis, 1977).…”
Section: K(t)=k R (A+ E Bi E-k~mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations