Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
1992
DOI: 10.1016/0009-2614(92)80073-k
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kinetics of dissociation and thermionic emission in the C60 and C70 molecules

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
18
0

Year Published

1993
1993
1997
1997

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
4
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the reaction just mentioned, for example, a value of 0.46 ± 0.16 eV is obtained [29]. This value agrees, within the error bar, with values reported for metastable dissociation of C z+ 60 (z = 1, 2) into C z+ 58 [30,31], and for electron induced dissociative post-ionization of C + 60 into C 2+ 58 [4]. However, the small differences which one would expect to see in the KER for different precursors (charge state z) and for different reactions and time windows (metastable versus induced) are still masked by the experimental uncertainties.…”
Section: B Appearance and Ionization Energies Of Multiply Charged C 70supporting
confidence: 72%
“…For the reaction just mentioned, for example, a value of 0.46 ± 0.16 eV is obtained [29]. This value agrees, within the error bar, with values reported for metastable dissociation of C z+ 60 (z = 1, 2) into C z+ 58 [30,31], and for electron induced dissociative post-ionization of C + 60 into C 2+ 58 [4]. However, the small differences which one would expect to see in the KER for different precursors (charge state z) and for different reactions and time windows (metastable versus induced) are still masked by the experimental uncertainties.…”
Section: B Appearance and Ionization Energies Of Multiply Charged C 70supporting
confidence: 72%
“…This "linkedchains" stage may allow the ejection of fragments other than C2 and the subsequent annealing of the chain back into a fullerene before further destruction. These endings may have some impact on the discrepancy [15,33] between the theoretical numbers for C6o dissociation energetics (-10 -12 eV for Cz loss) [15,34] and the experimental numbers ( -5 -7 eV) [2,3,7,8,33]. Basically, the theoretical results are for loss of C2 from a closed, fullerenelike structure, whereas experiments probe loss of C-containing species (C -C4) from the different, moreopen structures discussed above.…”
Section: Shown Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our result immediately shows that the yield of dimer emission, η C2 , does not exceed that of electron emission by more than a factor of η C2 /η e < (1 − η e )/η e ≈ 40 (or a maximum of 65 if we take into account the uncertainty of η e ). This constitutes the first experimental proof that thermionic emission is not merely parasitic to dissociation [6].…”
Section: Quantum Yield For Thermionic Emissionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This would support the notion that emission of C 4 or even larger fragments is a significant feeding channel in the amazingly efficient production of even-sized fragment ions below C + 58 . Is it really true that thermionic emission from excited C 60 is merely parasitic to emission of C 2 [6]? This would imply that the activation energy, D 60 , for the reaction C 60 → C 58 +C 2 is small compared to the ionization energy of C 60 , which is known to be IE 60 = 7.6 eV [14,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation