1993
DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.1993.tb00276.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kinetics improvement of high-grade sulphides bioleaching by effects separation

Abstract: The kinetics of bioleaching of sulphide concentrates by Thiobacillus ferrooxidans can be improved by performing separately the two operations relating the two effects involved in the indirect contact mechanism, (1) chemical leaching and (2) biological oxidation of the Fe2+ produced in the chemical stage (IBES: Indirect Bioleaching with Effects Separation). This scheme permits the separate enhancement of each stage. On the one hand, the chemical attack of the ferric iron to sulphides can be performed at a highe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The term "deep in situ biomining" (DISB) has been used to describe an emerging approach for extracting and recovering base metals buried 1-2 km in the lithosphere [26][27][28]. DISB combines indirect bioleaching, where the abiotic dissolution of a sulfidic ore or concentrate by an acidic, ferric iron-rich lixiviant and the biological regeneration of oxidised iron following the stripping of the target solubilised metal(s), are spatially separated (e.g., Reference [29]) with in situ leaching (ISL) which is, as noted, not a new concept. An ISL process for recovering uranium was first introduced in the USA in 1959 and was estimated to account for 51% of global U production in 2014 [30].…”
Section: Deep In Situ Biominingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The term "deep in situ biomining" (DISB) has been used to describe an emerging approach for extracting and recovering base metals buried 1-2 km in the lithosphere [26][27][28]. DISB combines indirect bioleaching, where the abiotic dissolution of a sulfidic ore or concentrate by an acidic, ferric iron-rich lixiviant and the biological regeneration of oxidised iron following the stripping of the target solubilised metal(s), are spatially separated (e.g., Reference [29]) with in situ leaching (ISL) which is, as noted, not a new concept. An ISL process for recovering uranium was first introduced in the USA in 1959 and was estimated to account for 51% of global U production in 2014 [30].…”
Section: Deep In Situ Biominingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is possible to accelerate bioleaching by carrying out the chemical leaching and biological Fe 2+ oxidation stages in separate locations, allowing optimisation of each independently. [15][16][17] Bio-oxidation can be improved using reactors designed specifically for this purpose. Among the tested designs, the one which has shown the greatest Fe 3+ productivities is the flooded packed bed reactor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is possible to accelerate bioleaching by carrying out the chemical leaching and biological Fe 2+ oxidation stages in separate locations, allowing optimisation of each independently . Bio‐oxidation can be improved using reactors designed specifically for this purpose.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On other hand, conventional processes of concentrate produce many problems [6][7][8] in recovery of metals from wastes and low grade ores. This bio technique is economical and offers reduced environmental pollution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%