2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.molliq.2016.03.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kinetics and thermodynamics of Eu(III) and U(VI) adsorption onto palygorskite

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 3 show the SEM images of Py (A) and MPy (B). It can be observed that the natural pyrite crystal has a large size with smooth surfaces, while the modified pyrite has abundant inhomogeneous pores, resulting in modified pyrite with a higher porosity and higher specific surface area than natural pyrite, which confirms the result obtained from previous studies [31][32][33]. Based on previous studies by the authors, the sorption process of Hg(II) by MPy can be fitted by the Langmuir model and the Freundlich model.…”
Section: Structure and Property Of Modified Pyritesupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Figure 3 show the SEM images of Py (A) and MPy (B). It can be observed that the natural pyrite crystal has a large size with smooth surfaces, while the modified pyrite has abundant inhomogeneous pores, resulting in modified pyrite with a higher porosity and higher specific surface area than natural pyrite, which confirms the result obtained from previous studies [31][32][33]. Based on previous studies by the authors, the sorption process of Hg(II) by MPy can be fitted by the Langmuir model and the Freundlich model.…”
Section: Structure and Property Of Modified Pyritesupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The calculated q e agreed with the experimental data (q exp ). These results indicate that adsorption in palygorskite samples can be determined mainly by chemisorption, involving the sharing or transfer of electrons [103,104]…”
Section: Adsorption Kineticsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The peak at 3649 cm −1 refers to the −OH vibrations [12,35]. The characteristic absorbance peak at 3649 cm −1 of MPy-600-Hg(II) is higher, which can be ascribed to the formation of ferric hydroxide from the dissolution of iron, and more Hg(OH) 2 is formed by attracting more −OH molecules to Hg(II) [36]. The relative intensities of the MPy-600-Hg(II) peaks at 483 cm −1 and 1076 cm −1 are lower, which probably suggests that MPy-600 reacted with Hg(II) [37].…”
Section: The Ftir and Raman Spectramentioning
confidence: 99%