“…C 2 in the equation is 0.103, 40 and C 1 , m , and n are fitted with optimal constants of 0.16, 5, and 1, respectively. The comparison between the calculated value, and the experimental value 37 is shown in Figure 11F, and it can be found that the prediction model is in good agreement with the experimental results (The error is less than 5%). Moreover, we found that the larger the , the better the dispersion, the larger the λ , the more favorable the reaction, the larger the , the larger the porosity, the larger the reaction volume, and the larger the λ , the more favorable the reaction.…”