“…Mixed-halide perovskite quantum dots (QDs) afford a very facile way to adjust emission through changing the ratio of different halides, making CsPb(Br/I) 3 QDs exhibit a bright applying prospect in pure-red PeLEDs. − However, for the dynamic bonding between native ligands (oleylamine (OAm) and oleic acid (OA)) and the QDs, these ligands can be easily stripped off during the isolation/purification process, resulting in undercoordinated Pb 2+ clusters at the surface of the QDs. , These undercoordinated Pb 2+ clusters consist of imperfect Pb(Br/I) 6 4– octahedra with halide vacancies, which are regarded as the lead-rich surface for the perovskites . The traps relevant to lead-rich surface were n states, and these n traps with deep-energy-level natures would pin the Fermi energy levels ( E f ) around the conduction band edge (CB), resulting in poor hole transportation and serious nonradiative recombination. , Furthermore, due to the ionic nature of perovskite materials and the weak van der Waals forces between Cs + and X – of the [PbX 6 ] 4– octahedron, halide ion migration is usually observed in CsPb(Br/I) 3 QDs under an electric field, which results in shifted EL and device degradation. − Moreover, the halide vacancies on the lead-rich surface of the QDs usually serve as channels for halide ion migration, which accelerates halide ions in rearranging and forming Br-rich and I-rich regions, leading to severe phase separation in the CsPb(Br/I) 3 QDs. − As discussed above, the lead-rich surface is considered to be the key factor affecting the performance of pure-red PeLEDs based on CsPb(Br/I) 3 QDs. To date, the most commonly used method to eliminate the surface defects of QDs is to find a new ligand with a stronger bonding with lead ions. , Although this is very effective for improving the efficiency and stability of the materials and devices, it cannot remove the lead-rich surface of QDs thoroughly.…”