2012
DOI: 10.2144/0000113853
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kinetically Limited Differential Centrifugation as an Inexpensive and Readily Available Alternative to Centrifugal Elutriation

Abstract: When separating two species with similar densities but differing sedimentation velocities (because of differences in size), centrifugal elutriation is generally the method of choice. However, a major drawback to this approach is the requirement for specialized equipment. Here, we present a new method that achieves similar separations using standard benchtop centrifuges by loading the seperands as a layer on top of a dense buffer of a specified length, and running the benchtop centrifugation process for a calcu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(17 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To isolate leukocytes, blood was layered onto Histopaque-1083 (Sigma) for density gradient centrifugation. Leukocytes were collected between the plasma layer and the pellet containing red blood cells (RBCs) and extracellular bacteria ( 34 ). Isolated leukocytes were then washed well and resuspended in Fcγ block for flow cytometric analysis or lysed in sterile water to quantify cell-associated CFU.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To isolate leukocytes, blood was layered onto Histopaque-1083 (Sigma) for density gradient centrifugation. Leukocytes were collected between the plasma layer and the pellet containing red blood cells (RBCs) and extracellular bacteria ( 34 ). Isolated leukocytes were then washed well and resuspended in Fcγ block for flow cytometric analysis or lysed in sterile water to quantify cell-associated CFU.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Separation of the bacterial fraction from the platelet samples was performed using the density difference between platelets (1.05−1.07) and bacteria (>1.10). 43 This separation of bacterial fraction from platelets was performed by adding Histopaque-1083 and using centrifugation, as shown in Figure S4. The quantitative analysis of the Gram-negative bacteria in the platelet samples was performed via the reaction of the separated bacterial fraction with anti-OMP antibodies through flow cytometry.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The isolated anti-OMP antibodies against Gram-negative bacteria and anti-LTA antibodies against Gram-positive bacteria were employed for the detection of bacterial contamination in platelets. Separation of the bacterial fraction from the platelet samples was performed using the density difference between platelets (1.05–1.07) and bacteria (>1.10) . This separation of bacterial fraction from platelets was performed by adding Histopaque-1083 and using centrifugation, as shown in Figure S4.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bacteria in the collected blood were extracted by differential centrifugation according to the method described by Tan [ 30 ] with modifications. Briefly, three blood samples were centrifuged first at 200 × g for 10 min at 4℃; then, at 1,000 × g for 1 min and 1,500 × g for 30 sec to remove blood cells.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%