2003
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.91.236101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kinetic Wetting of a Moving Planar Defect by a New Phase

Abstract: Close to a bulk phase transition, a moving planar defect can be covered by a layer of the ordered phase. This, in fact, happens above the transition point in some finite region of the temperature-velocity diagram. In the case of a first-order transition this region is furnished with a net of nonequilibrium phase-transition lines. The topology of this net resembles that of the phase diagram of a first-order wetting transition in thermal equilibrium. In particular, there appears a kinetic complete-wetting line w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(20 reference statements)
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This theory was applied in [8,59,63,64] to solutions of some material problems, including revealing an athermal hysteresis which depends on the ratio of the phase interface width and the magnitude of the Burgers vector of a dislocation, finding a mechanism of semicoherent interface motion, dislocation inheritance by propagating phase interface, and the temperature-induced nucleation, growth, and arrest of M plate in an A bicrystal. Some earlier PFAs on interaction of PTs and discrete dislocations include analytical [65] and numerical [66,67] solutions for M nucleation on dislocations, which were introduced through their stationary stress fields, or which belong to the moving phase interface only [68] and consequently do not involve phase field equations for dislocations and their inheritance during PT.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This theory was applied in [8,59,63,64] to solutions of some material problems, including revealing an athermal hysteresis which depends on the ratio of the phase interface width and the magnitude of the Burgers vector of a dislocation, finding a mechanism of semicoherent interface motion, dislocation inheritance by propagating phase interface, and the temperature-induced nucleation, growth, and arrest of M plate in an A bicrystal. Some earlier PFAs on interaction of PTs and discrete dislocations include analytical [65] and numerical [66,67] solutions for M nucleation on dislocations, which were introduced through their stationary stress fields, or which belong to the moving phase interface only [68] and consequently do not involve phase field equations for dislocations and their inheritance during PT.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10,11 There are a few simplified PFA approaches to study the interaction between PT and dislocations. There are a number of analytical treatments of M nucleation on dislocations based on PFA to PT, 12 followed by numerical 13 simulations. Dislocations are introduced through their stationary stress field or are located at the moving phase interface only 14 and therefore do not require additional PFA equations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are a number of analytical treatments of M nucleation on dislocations based on PFA to PT (Korzhenevskii et al (2003)), followed by numerical (Reid et al (1998); Wang and Khachaturyan (2006)) simulations. Dislocations are introduced through their stationary stress field or are located at the moving phase interface only (Kundin et al (2011a)) and therefore do not require additional PFA equations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%