1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0375-9474(99)00193-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kinetic-theory approach to low-energy collective modes in nuclei

Abstract: Two different solutions of the linearized Vlasov equation for finite systems, characterized by fixed and moving-surface boundary conditions, are discussed in a unified perspective. A condition determining the eigenfrequencies of collective nuclear oscillations, that can be obtained from the moving-surface solution, is studied for isoscalar vibrations of lowest multipolarity. Analytic expressions for the friction and mass parameters related to the low-enegy surface excitations are derived and their value is com… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…motion (see also Ref. [12]). Clearly quantum calculations are, in principle, more rigorous than a semiclassical one, but our hope is that the physical insight allowed for by the semiclassical method will make our results more transparent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…motion (see also Ref. [12]). Clearly quantum calculations are, in principle, more rigorous than a semiclassical one, but our hope is that the physical insight allowed for by the semiclassical method will make our results more transparent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The fluctuation δ̺ k (r, ω) is the time Fourier transform of the density fluctuation δ̺ k (r, t) induced by an external field V ext (r, t) = βδ(t)r k Y 1M (r). This fluctuation can be obtained by integrating over momentum the phase-space density fluctuation δn k (r, p, t) that is given by the solution of the linearized Vlasov equation, either with fixed-surface [17] or with movingsurface [11,12] boundary conditions: δ̺ k (r, t) = dp δn k (r, p, t).…”
Section: Formalismmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This question can be partially answered by comparing with experimental data the response to an external force evaluated by using different boundary conditions. Such a program has been carried out by our group for isoscalar (i.e., with neutron and proton densities oscillating in phase) excitations in heavy nuclei (Abrosimov et al 1999(Abrosimov et al , 2002a(Abrosimov et al , 2003a(Abrosimov et al , 2003b(Abrosimov et al , 2002b. This article is a review of that work.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%