1981
DOI: 10.1016/0032-3950(81)90335-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kinetic study of catalysis of the chain transfer reaction to monomer in the radical polymerization of methyl methacrylate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparison of this expression with Equation (3) shows that monomer renewal from macromonomer strongly influences the polymerization rate at higher catalyst concentrations. However, Equation (6) still predicts an increase of the polymerization rate with increasing cobalt concentration (though this increase is now expected to be not higher than a factor of two), in contrast to experimental data 2, 13–16…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Comparison of this expression with Equation (3) shows that monomer renewal from macromonomer strongly influences the polymerization rate at higher catalyst concentrations. However, Equation (6) still predicts an increase of the polymerization rate with increasing cobalt concentration (though this increase is now expected to be not higher than a factor of two), in contrast to experimental data 2, 13–16…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…This expected increase of the polymerization rate is attributed to monomer consumption due to reaction (1e). However, instead of an increase, experiments show a decrease of polymerization rate with cobalt catalyst 2, 13–16. One contributing factor to this decrease is that Equation (3) does not take into account the fact that macromonomer with a chain length of one is simply monomer, as expressed by the transformation “reaction”: …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The curvature in Figure 1a may be due to several reasons: (i) there may be errors in the SEC analysis originating from too few low molecular weight calibration standards and the differential refractive index detector response is chain length dependent for low molecular weight chains 32 (so it is difficult to ascertain whether the curvature is real or an artifact of the analysis); (ii) it has been shown previously that C S is chain length dependent for short chains 7,33 (i.e., the region of interest in this case), which can introduce curvature in the ln P(M) vs M plots; [33][34][35] (iii) as previously mentioned, eq 1 gives approximate character in the case of short chains. 21 The Mayo 30,36 method was not suitable for measuring the C S of COBF with AMS since the molecular weights produced were very low, causing difficulty in determining accurate values of the number average molecular weight, M n .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 1975, Boris Smirnov and Alexander Marchenko discovered a method in which they could control the molecular weight in a methacrylate polymerization by introducing catalysts that could greatly enhance the process of chain transfer to monomer . They found that substituted cobalt porphyrins, 1 , or benzoporphyrins, 2 , provided dramatic reductions in the molecular weight of the methacrylate polymers during radical polymerization with little to no reduction in overall yield of polymer.
…”
Section: 2 Catalytic Chain Transfermentioning
confidence: 99%