1970
DOI: 10.1021/bi00821a021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kinetic studies of the nitrogenase-catalyzed hydrogen evolution and nitrogen reduction reactions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
58
3
1

Year Published

1973
1973
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(16 reference statements)
2
58
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This supports the suggestion by Chatt (1980) that N2 binds to Kplt by the displacement of H2 and that the inhibition by H2 of NH3 formation is a massaction effect on this equilibrium. In Scheme 3, this occurs at species E3 and E4 in order to explain the results reported by Silverstein & Bulen (1970) and , which showed that the relative steady-state rates of H2 and NH3 formation depended on the electron flux through the MoFe protein. NH3 formation…”
Section: Computingmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…This supports the suggestion by Chatt (1980) that N2 binds to Kplt by the displacement of H2 and that the inhibition by H2 of NH3 formation is a massaction effect on this equilibrium. In Scheme 3, this occurs at species E3 and E4 in order to explain the results reported by Silverstein & Bulen (1970) and , which showed that the relative steady-state rates of H2 and NH3 formation depended on the electron flux through the MoFe protein. NH3 formation…”
Section: Computingmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…For example, using 5-7 mM Ti(III) as reductant, nitrogenase is active and the ATP utilization per electron pair transferred (ATP/2e) decreases from 4 -5, typically observed with DT, to values near 2 (10,11 (6,12), MoFe inhibition (6,12), the dilution effect (13)(14)(15)(16), the delay in product formation (the lag phase) at high MoFe:Fe protein ratios (17,18), and inhibition due to Av-Cp heterologous cross reactions (19 -21) ), and used for the experiments described below (11).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The larger *protein (molecular weight 210,000-242,000) contains Mo, Fe, and acid-labile sulfur, whereas the smaller protein (molecular weight 55,000-66,000) contains Fe and acid-labile sulfur. Because neither protein alone exhibits any catalytic activity, they frequently are described as forming a catalytically competent complex (2)(3)(4). An alternative explanation of the behavior of the two proteins is that the smaller protein serves as a specific reductase for the larger protein, and that the larger protein then reduces N2 or other substrates.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%