2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpc.2004.11.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kinetic studies of iron deposition catalyzed by recombinant human liver heavy, and light ferritins and Azotobacter vinelandii bacterioferritin using O2 and H2O2 as oxidants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
25
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar differences in rates for the two oxidants have been reported for HuLF. 31,37 The kinetic differences between the two oxidants in L-rich ferritin were also reflected in a significant difference in the absorbance values of the resultant cores (Figure 5C). The molar absorptivity value of the μ -oxo/hydroxo-Fe(III) core produced by H 2 O 2 was 2200 ± 100 M −1 cm −1 versus 3400 ± 200 M −1 cm −1 for that produced by O 2 as the oxidant, indicating significantly different mineral structures.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Similar differences in rates for the two oxidants have been reported for HuLF. 31,37 The kinetic differences between the two oxidants in L-rich ferritin were also reflected in a significant difference in the absorbance values of the resultant cores (Figure 5C). The molar absorptivity value of the μ -oxo/hydroxo-Fe(III) core produced by H 2 O 2 was 2200 ± 100 M −1 cm −1 versus 3400 ± 200 M −1 cm −1 for that produced by O 2 as the oxidant, indicating significantly different mineral structures.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This proposed reaction might not be as physiologically relevant as reaction at the ferroxidase site, because it is unlikely that the cell experiences these high Fe(II) levels. Nevertheless, attempts to confirm the surface catalysis model have been ongoing, but recent results do not support this reaction and alternative explanations were proposed [12,13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Considerable evidence using O 2 supports these two processes, but recent results suggest that iron deposition with O 2 is more complicated than originally thought [12,13]. The complications arise because O 2 is reduced to H 2 O 2 , which either reacts with Fe(II) to form mineral core (Fe(II)/O 2 = 4.0) or undergoes secondary reactions with solution components (Fe(II)/O 2 = $2.5).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…7). This reaction becomes predominant as the amount of Fe(II) atoms increases, and when the core is already formed (Bunker et al 2005). Fig.…”
Section: Iron Mineralization Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%