2009
DOI: 10.1088/1742-5468/2009/02/p02036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kinetic roughening in a realistic model of non-conserved interface growth

Abstract: We provide a quantitative picture of non-conserved interface growth from a diffusive field making special emphasis on two main issues, the range of validity of the effective small-slopes (interfacial) theories and the interplay between the emergence of morphologically instabilities in the aggregate dynamics, and its kinetic roughening properties. Taking for definiteness electrochemical deposition as our experimental field of reference, our theoretical approach makes use of two complementary approaches: interfa… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
42
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
3
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From the data in table 1 and equation (5), we can estimate k D 0.75 cm s −1 , which is considerably higher than V = 2.4 × 10 −8 cm s −1 . Hence, the system can be assumed to be in the fast kinetics regime for which equation (1) is expected to hold [7][8][9]. In spite of the previous assessment of parameter values, still many microscopic details of the experimental setup cannot be measured or even estimated from data, mainly due to the limited resolution of the experimental measurements and also due to the coexistence of species both in the vapor phase and at the very same aggregate surface: to cite a few, the mean atomic volume of aggregating species at the surface, surface tension, or the capillarity length.…”
Section: Comparison With Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the data in table 1 and equation (5), we can estimate k D 0.75 cm s −1 , which is considerably higher than V = 2.4 × 10 −8 cm s −1 . Hence, the system can be assumed to be in the fast kinetics regime for which equation (1) is expected to hold [7][8][9]. In spite of the previous assessment of parameter values, still many microscopic details of the experimental setup cannot be measured or even estimated from data, mainly due to the limited resolution of the experimental measurements and also due to the coexistence of species both in the vapor phase and at the very same aggregate surface: to cite a few, the mean atomic volume of aggregating species at the surface, surface tension, or the capillarity length.…”
Section: Comparison With Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beyond their role as realistic descriptions of experimental interfaces (additional examples exist for electrodeposition [14] and for unstable flame propagation [29]), these equations are interesting for their combination of nonlocality and fluctuations, having remained poorly understood to date [7]. Moreover, they may account for similarities between diffusive and ballistic surface growth [8,11].…”
Section: Prl 102 256102 (2009) P H Y S I C a L R E V I E W L E T T Ementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, unstable dispersion relations of the same form as in Eq. (1) have been seen to describe effectively (for 0 <<2, m ¼ 2) experiments of surface growth by electrodeposition [14]. While the stable version of Eq.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, those works did not analyze this crossover in detail because their focus were long time growth properties, such as surface instability and anomalous scaling of the roughness. Most theoretical approaches for electrodeposition have the same focus; for instance, in systems with instability control mechanisms, a transition from initial unstable growth to standard kinetic roughening may be observed [10,11]. Instead, the short time crossover analyzed here occurs in the opposite direction: from initial kinetic roughening dominated by surface diffusion [36,37] to long time instability developement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%