2011
DOI: 10.4161/cc.10.13.16249
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kinetic profiling of the c-Myc transcriptome and bioinformatic analysis of repressed gene promoters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
40
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
3
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Independent of the anti-proliferative effects of MYC and G9a, we show that depleting G9a protein or inhibiting its catalytic activity preferentially hinders MYC binding at repressed genes and shifts repressed loci marked by H3K9me2 to active epigenetic states, leading to upregulated gene expression. Although E-box motifs have been reported to strongly associate with MYC-activated genes (Yap et al, 2011), our genome-wide data show that (C) mRNA expression of MYC-activated and -repressed genes in MDAMB231 and SKBR3 treated with UNC0642 or DMSO control for 96 hr (n = 3; mean ± SD; Bonferroni corrected one-way ANOVA compared with DMSO). (D) ChIP-qPCR for H3K9me2, MYC, or IgG in MDAMB231 and SKBR3 treated with 2 mM UNC0642 or DMSO (n = 3 for MDAMB231, n = 4 for SKBR3; mean ± SD; Bonferroni corrected two-way ANOVA compared with DMSO).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Independent of the anti-proliferative effects of MYC and G9a, we show that depleting G9a protein or inhibiting its catalytic activity preferentially hinders MYC binding at repressed genes and shifts repressed loci marked by H3K9me2 to active epigenetic states, leading to upregulated gene expression. Although E-box motifs have been reported to strongly associate with MYC-activated genes (Yap et al, 2011), our genome-wide data show that (C) mRNA expression of MYC-activated and -repressed genes in MDAMB231 and SKBR3 treated with UNC0642 or DMSO control for 96 hr (n = 3; mean ± SD; Bonferroni corrected one-way ANOVA compared with DMSO). (D) ChIP-qPCR for H3K9me2, MYC, or IgG in MDAMB231 and SKBR3 treated with 2 mM UNC0642 or DMSO (n = 3 for MDAMB231, n = 4 for SKBR3; mean ± SD; Bonferroni corrected two-way ANOVA compared with DMSO).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Different letters indicate statistical significant differences (P < 0.05). 50 Thus, it is not surprising that cyclins D1 to D3 and cyclins E1 to E2 are among those genes described as "Myc target genes." In the present investigation, we show that RSV suppresses FSH-stimulated Sertoli cell proliferation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While in many of the early studies rather late time points were chosen after the activation of MYC and thus it was not clear whether all the regulated genes were indeed direct MYC targets, more recent investigations used also short induction times. In one study several hundred genes were either activated or repressed within 2 and 3 h of MYC activation (Yap et al, 2011). Because in all these analyses RNA levels are measured, effects on RNA processing, in particular RNA stability, may also contribute to the observed differences.…”
Section: Posttranslational Regulation Of Mycmentioning
confidence: 98%