2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.coche.2018.12.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kinetic Monte Carlo approach for molecular modeling of adsorption

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, μ°(T) is the standard chemical potential, and A is the surface area. Combining eqs 12 and 13, we get the required expression for the excess chemical potential: 72,73,81,82…”
Section: External Potentialmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Here, μ°(T) is the standard chemical potential, and A is the surface area. Combining eqs 12 and 13, we get the required expression for the excess chemical potential: 72,73,81,82…”
Section: External Potentialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The external potential can be positive or negative and its variation affects the chemical potential of the whole system and allows for evaluating fundamental dependences such as the dependence of the pressure on the chemical potential. This technique based on the kinetic Monte Carlo simulation in an elongated cell was successfully used in a large number of applications. The only shortcoming is that in the case of large molecules interacting with each other with a substantially high potential energy, the density of the equilibrium gas phase is too small to determine the chemical potential reliably. The combination of the two external fields resolves this problem because the damping field transforms the gas phase to the ideal gas of any density, while the external potential allows for keeping the crystal at any pressure.…”
Section: Theoretical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since the chemical potential is the same in any point of the equilibrium system, the determined chemical potential for the gas phase is equal to that of the dense phase. The efficiency of this group of methods was enhanced by using the kinetic Monte Carlo (kMC) scheme. , The reason is that, in each kMC step, the molecule to be displaced is selected not randomly as in the standard MC algorithm but proportionally to the exponential function of its potential energy (or rate), which is much larger for the gas phase compared to that of the crystal (sometimes in several orders of magnitude). This makes the gas phase significantly more statistically representative and substantially reduces statistical errors in the chemical potential, which is especially important when the gas phase is extremely rarefied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The kMC was extended to understand equilibrium systems with the canonical ensemble for the simulation of vapor–liquid equilibrium, as well as adsorption on surfaces and in confined spaces. , However, the canonical ensemble is limited to a closed system, and thus further extensions involve the grand canonical ensemble for the simulation of an open system, isothermal–isobaric ensemble to determine the state of the system, and Gibbs- NVT ensembles to determine the saturated properties of the mixture . One key advantage of kMC compared to the conventional Metropolis Monte Carlo is the direct, highly accurate determination of the chemical potentials in both dilute and dense phases. , The equilibrium studies via kMC are summarized in an earlier work …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%