2022
DOI: 10.2166/wst.2022.074
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kinetic models evaluation for chemical organic matter removal prediction in a full-scale primary facultative pond treating municipal wastewater

Abstract: This study focuses on determining the bio-kinetic coefficients of chemical oxygen demand (COD) removal in full-scale primary facultative ponds (PFPs) system on the basis of 3-year continuous operation. The mean removal of chemical oxygen demand (COD), total suspended solid (TSS) and volatile suspended solid (VSS) were 80, 59 and 49%, respectively. The first-order model paired with continuous stirred-tank reactor (CSTR) and plug flow (PF) regimes, PF k–C*, Stover-Kincannon and Grau second-order models were appl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(30 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The study is employed formulas to evaluate and calibrate the BOD concentration of remaining and removal in the hydraulic regime (Alavi, et al , 2022;Ammary, et al , 2014;Von Sperling, 2007) as below:…”
Section: Bod Modelling and Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study is employed formulas to evaluate and calibrate the BOD concentration of remaining and removal in the hydraulic regime (Alavi, et al , 2022;Ammary, et al , 2014;Von Sperling, 2007) as below:…”
Section: Bod Modelling and Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The statistical analysis involved comparing model-predicted data with actual experimental results obtained from anaerobic fermentation reactors. To evaluate the performance of the biokinetic models, various statistical metrics and error measures were employed, including the coefficient of determination (R 2 ), root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), and relative percentage error (RPE) (Alavi and Ansari, 2022;Yaqub and Lee, 2022;Zhong et al, 2021). These metrics allowed researchers to quantitatively assess the agreement between the model predictions and the experimental data.…”
Section: Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three indices were evaluated to find which kinetic model best describes the behavior of the experimental data: the coefficient of determination (R 2 ), the IA index (IA), and the root mean square error (RMSE) (Alavi & Ansari, 2022;McCuen et al, 2006;Rahman & Sathasivam, 2015;Suteu et al, 2016).…”
Section: Model Evaluation Indices For Copper Adsorptionmentioning
confidence: 99%