2021
DOI: 10.1186/s40643-021-00465-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kinetic modelling of the solid–liquid extraction process of polyphenolic compounds from apple pomace: influence of solvent composition and temperature

Abstract: This study aims to assess kinetic modelling of the solid–liquid extraction process of total polyphenolic compounds (TPC) from apple pomace (AP). In this regard, we investigated the effects of temperature and solvent (i.e. water, ethanol, and acetone) on TPC extraction over various periods. The highest TPC yield of 11.1 ± 0.49 mg gallic acid equivalent (GAE)/g db (dry basis) was achieved with a mixture of 65% acetone–35% water (v/v) at 60 °C. The kinetics of the solvent-based TPC extraction processes were asses… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
42
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
42
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This study demonstrated that values of TPC and three ACs were significantly different among six extraction methods, and the extraction method of pectinase generally showed the highest values of total polyphenol content, whereas EtOH-2 (an ethanol solvent including a second phase ethanol treatment) showed the lowest values of the parameter for all cultivars (Table 1, Figure 2). In solid-liquid extraction methods, solvents of ethanol, methanol, and acetone are widely applied extraction techniques, e.g., [46]; however, results of previous studies widely differ in the efficacy of extraction methods on the polyphenol content and antioxidant capacity of fruits, e.g., [18,[46][47][48][49]. For instance, the efficiency of water, methanol, and acetone solvents was shown to be significant for the extraction of the soluble polyphenolic compounds [46].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This study demonstrated that values of TPC and three ACs were significantly different among six extraction methods, and the extraction method of pectinase generally showed the highest values of total polyphenol content, whereas EtOH-2 (an ethanol solvent including a second phase ethanol treatment) showed the lowest values of the parameter for all cultivars (Table 1, Figure 2). In solid-liquid extraction methods, solvents of ethanol, methanol, and acetone are widely applied extraction techniques, e.g., [46]; however, results of previous studies widely differ in the efficacy of extraction methods on the polyphenol content and antioxidant capacity of fruits, e.g., [18,[46][47][48][49]. For instance, the efficiency of water, methanol, and acetone solvents was shown to be significant for the extraction of the soluble polyphenolic compounds [46].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The good extraction efficiency of a water-ethanol mixture can be explained because ethanol may weaken the bonds between polyphenolics-protein and polyphenolics-cellulose [49]. In addition, the study of Hobbi et al [18] showed that the highest total polyphenol content was measured in a mixture of 65:35 acetone:water (v/v) at 60 • C compared to other unmixed solvents (i.e., water, acetone, and ethanol). Our study confirmed a good yield of polyphenol content using the pectinase extraction method, and using the solvents of ethanol and methanol used alone (Figure 2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…  (7) where 𝐼 ̇𝑜𝑢𝑡 𝑐𝑝 denotes the rate of PEI out of the process from chemical interactions; 𝐼 ̇𝑜𝑢𝑡 𝑒𝑝 denotes the rate of PEI out of a system from energy generation processes; 𝑀 ̇𝑖 𝑜𝑢𝑡 is the mass flow rate of exit streams from the process i. xki is the mass fraction of component k in the exit stream i and øk is the potential environmental impact due to component k. The parameter, øk, denotes the sum of the specific PEI due to disposal of component k to the environment leading to different impact categories l as follows [89];…”
Section: Environmental Performance Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The poor management of this WAP stream may lead to unfavorable environmental outcomes such as uncontrolled GHG emissions from the disposal of pomace in landfills, unwanted acidification of agricultural soils via leachate formation and also the pollution of underground waters [6]. The utilization of WAP as a biomass resource therefore presents an opportunity for value extraction while also circumventing waste management concerns [7]. The current study therefore seeks to investigate the production of AA from WAP.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%