2010
DOI: 10.2355/isijinternational.50.712
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kinetic Modeling on Nozzle Clogging During Steel Billet Continuous Casting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Zhang et al [25][26][27] tracked the trajectories and entrapment locations of inclusions in a slidegate nozzle. Long et al 35) studied the Al 2 O 3 inclusion behavior in a turbulent pipe flow. Effects of factors, such as release location of inclusion, inclusion size, pipe diameter, casting speed, on the entrapment probability were investigated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Zhang et al [25][26][27] tracked the trajectories and entrapment locations of inclusions in a slidegate nozzle. Long et al 35) studied the Al 2 O 3 inclusion behavior in a turbulent pipe flow. Effects of factors, such as release location of inclusion, inclusion size, pipe diameter, casting speed, on the entrapment probability were investigated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, steel flows in nozzles were also studied and compared by using of different turbulence models. [30][31][32][33][34][35] Some researchers also studied the inclusion behavior in a nozzle during casting. Wilson et al 14) investigated the steel flow characteristics in a nozzle and tracked the trajectories of inclusions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to understand the deposition location and mechanism, computational fluid dynamics (CFD) studies have been carried out to investigate the inclusion transport in turbulent steel flows and its deposition on the SEN walls. [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] Deposition rates of inclusions on the SEN wall were predicted by using an Eulerian deposition model, which considered the transport of inclusions in the turbulent flow boundary layer as well as the turbophoresis effect. [16,17] Finally, inclusions move into the mold accompanying steel flows, where the solidification of molten steel happens.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] Other authors have studied the fluidynamics inside the nozzle trying to figure out the inclusion deposition at the typical adhesion zones, finding that these are related to low pressure and high turbulence zones. [22][23][24][25][26] In contrast, many researchers have tried to establish the variables affecting the inclusion trajectory, focusing on the forces balance. Sasai et al 27) found that the drag force is the dominant force, and when the inclusion size is 10 micrometers, the buoyant and gravitational forces are 4 order of magnitude lower than this force, and for inclusion sizes of 1 micrometer the difference between the order of magnitude is higher.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%