2021
DOI: 10.1002/kin.21536
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kinetic modeling of Fischer–Tropsch‐to‐olefins process via advanced optimization

Abstract: The reaction kinetics of a Fischer–Tropsch (FT) process to produce lower olefins was modeled utilizing the experimental data produced using an in‐house synthesized iron‐based catalyst. Along with FT chain growth reaction that is assumed to follow alkyl mechanism, water–gas shift reaction was also taken into consideration due to its significance. Not only the rate constants but also apparent activation energies were obtained via an integrated approach utilizing multiobjective and constrained nonlinear minimizat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the absence of any term that represents these effects in the developed model influenced their molar flow rates in such a way as to cause a deviation from the ASF model. [ 77 ] The deviation from ASF product distribution can be assigned to dissolution in a liquid film on the catalyst surface and within the catalyst pores, increasing the readsorption probability of alkenes and the resulting secondary reactions, including hydrogenation, reinsertion, hydrogenolysis, and isomerization. Additionally, the readsorption of alkenes is carbon number‐dependent, and the following secondary reaction changes the FTS product distributions for heavier hydrocarbons.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the absence of any term that represents these effects in the developed model influenced their molar flow rates in such a way as to cause a deviation from the ASF model. [ 77 ] The deviation from ASF product distribution can be assigned to dissolution in a liquid film on the catalyst surface and within the catalyst pores, increasing the readsorption probability of alkenes and the resulting secondary reactions, including hydrogenation, reinsertion, hydrogenolysis, and isomerization. Additionally, the readsorption of alkenes is carbon number‐dependent, and the following secondary reaction changes the FTS product distributions for heavier hydrocarbons.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These models are needed to better optimize the reactors, i.e., their dimensions, length of the catalyst bed and catalyst properties, such as particle and pore size. A kinetic model for FTO process with iron catalyst has been proposed by Turan et al [59], but a kinetic model for Rh-catalyzed RWGS is not currently available. Similarly, process models for RWGS+FT Power-to-Liquid processes are available, for example, as described by Marchese et al [60], but a model for CO 2 to light olefins process does not exist.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%